Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2024
13
Organizations funded FY2023
15%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$40,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$750,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 13
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
5
Total assets, FY2024
$5k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 15% of the organizations Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving14$1.2M21%
FY202313$42k15%
FY202212$36k8%
FY202112$33k33%
FY20208$72k13%
FY20199$33k0%
FY20189$32k11%
FY20179$30kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.0MHealth$231kEducation$114kEmployment$49kFood & Nutrition$29kHuman Services$18kEnvironment$11k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ragdale Foundation$927,700838%
Benjamin's Hope$140,00041%
Stateline Down Syndrome Foundation$50,0001n/a
Zion Development Corporation$49,00084%
Project Onward$47,00087%
Maryland Institute$44,00050%
Fenix Family Health Center$31,40042%
The Lambs Farm Inc$15,00060%
Holland Museum$14,00042%
Lake Forest Foundation for Historic Preservation$12,00036%
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ragdale Foundation$927,700838%
Benjamin's Hope$140,00041%
Stateline Down Syndrome Foundation$50,0001n/a
Zion Development Corporation$49,00084%
Project Onward$47,00087%
Maryland Institute$44,00050%
Fenix Family Health Center$31,40042%
The Lambs Farm Inc$15,00060%
Holland Museum$14,00042%
Lake Forest Foundation for Historic Preservation$12,00036%
The Beacon Place NFP$11,00021%
Chicago Symphony Orchestra$11,00030%
Rosecrance Foundation Inc$10,00010%
Northern Illinois Food Bank$10,00010%
Rosecrance Inc$7,00070%
The Preservation Foundation Inc$2,0002n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($91k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 14 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRagdale Foundation: $927,700 over 8y, 38% of budgetBenjamin's Hope: $140,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetZion Development Corporation: $49,000 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetProject Onward: $47,000 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetMaryland Institute: $44,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFenix Family Health Center: $31,400 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetThe Lambs Farm Inc: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHolland Museum: $14,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetLake Forest Foundation for Historic Preservation: $12,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetThe Beacon Place NFP: $11,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRosecrance Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthern Illinois Food Bank: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosecrance Inc: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund?

Find your warmest path to Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund

How much does Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund give?
Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund reported 14 grants totaling $1,193,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (69%), Health (16%), Education (8%).
Who are Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Ragdale Foundation ($928k), Benjamin's Hope ($140k), Stateline Down Syndrome Foundation ($50k).
Does Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 15% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Chicago Community Trust, John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc.
Where is Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund based?
Peter & Penelope West Charitable Fund is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter & Penelope West’s filings →

More from the funding graph