Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peter and Cara Goodwin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$153k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222023.

Education$247kRecreation & Sports$40kHealth$30kReligion$20kYouth Development$10kEnvironment$10kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UP RVA$90,000
VIRGINIA ATHLETICS FOUNDATION$20,000
THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE$10,000
SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION$10,000
BOTANICAL GARDEN OF PIEDMONT$10,000
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
READYKIDS$2,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%READYKIDS: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$237k · 4 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$237k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+22%

Still filing today

75%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
EducationHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    UP RVA
    2× · 2022–2023 · $157k · revenue +20%
  • VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +11%
  • CE
    CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k

Funded once

  • UK
    UNC KENAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • SA
    ST ANNE'S BELLFIELD SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • PB
    Pebble Beach Company Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
2
Virginia Commonwealth University Foundat

To support the educational, scientific and charitable activities of virginia commonwealth university and related organizations.

Education
3
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
4
Va Foundation for Independent Colleges

To secure financial support that enables college-bound students to access and graduate from outstanding virginia independent higher education institutions.

Education
5
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
6
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
7
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
8
University of Virginia Alumni Association

The mission of the alumni association is to build the strongest bond among alumni and between alumni and the university by serving all alumni and students; being the center for engaging and connecting the global uva community; acting as a…

Education
9
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
10
University of Virginia Engineering Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the mission of the university of virginia school of engineering and applied science by leading efforts to build and sustain beneficial relationships and by raising, investing, managing and providing external private…

11
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Business Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to assist, support and foster the activities and mission of the school of business at virginia commonwealth university. it solicits, manages and distributes assets to benefit programs in the school of…

Education
12
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Virginia Student Aid Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pebble Beach Company Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UP RVA — $156,740 · EducationUP RVAVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · EducationVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INCUNC KENAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL — $50,000 · OtherUNC KENAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOLST ANNE'S BELLFIELD SCHOOL — $40,000 · OtherST ANNE'S BELLFIELD SCHOOLCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $20,000 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH+1 more — $500 · OtherSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthSHELTERIN…THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE — $10,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN…Pebble Beach Company Foundation — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT — $10,000 · EnvironmentREADYKIDS INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Education$196,740Other$110,500Health$30,000Philanthropy$11,000Environment$10,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUP RVA — $156,740 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREADYKIDS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oakwood Foundation Charitable TrustMS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · Commonwealth Foundations · The Genan Foundation · The Oak Hill Fund · Caplin Foundation · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peter and Cara Goodwin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peter and Cara Goodwin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peter and Cara Goodwin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph