Skip to content
Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$256k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$685kAnimals$418kInternational$201kHuman Services$133kCrime & Legal$81kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kCommunity Improvement$55kEmployment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION$87,900
SUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION$25,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER$15,000
CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING$15,000
ALBEMARLE HOPELINE$13,000
EVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE$12,500
A CHILD FOR ALL (ACFA)$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MASSAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND (MGEF)$10,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$10,000
PANGEA NETWORK$10,000
WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT$10,000
SPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA$6,000
MUTTVILLE$5,000
NAPILI KAI FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%THE CAROLINA FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE & HOME CARE: $5k → 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 11%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 33 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
23

Total granted

$1.5M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+5%

Still filing today

55%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $76k · revenue +285%
  • AH
    ALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $61k · revenue +32%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • SO
    SUNY ONEONTA
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SO
    SUNNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kauai Spca

To provide a safety net for Kauai's homeless pets that cannot be assisted through existing Island Rescue efforts.

Animals
2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
3
Hawaii Pet Network Inc

The organization rescues unwanted, injured, and neglected animals and rehomes them into forever homes. the organization promotes the benefits or spaying & neutering pets, educates the community about the humane treatment of animals, and is…

—
4
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
5
Advocates 4 Animals Pet Food Pantry

Advocates 4 Animals A4A Pet Pantry is a 100% volunteer 501c3 nonprofit dedicated to keeping animals with their families during financial hardship by providing pet food and spay-neuter assistance. We also operate an adoption program caring…

Animals
6
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
7
Lovebugs Rescue

Lovebugs rescue is a foster-based animal rescue located in southern california. we began our mission in october 2010 and focus on rescuing dogs from high kill shelters and neglect. we rescue all breeds and all ages. we provide all medical…

Animals
8
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
9
Caloosa Humane Society Inc

The mission of Caloosa Humane Society is to serve, shelter, and protect the homeless pets in our care. We are dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive homes for our companion animals in need. Our no-kill facility provides low…

Education
10
Second Chance Pet Adoptions Inc

To champion homeless cats and dogs who are healthy or treatable in the quest to find their forever homes and engage with our community to provide responsible pet ownership reducing future generations of homeless animals.

Animals
11
Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

To prevent the suffering and death of companion animals and to enrich the human-animal bond by providing excellent, accessible, and affordable spay/neuter and veterinary care.

Animals
12
Home Fur Good Animal Rescue and Placement

To eliminate euthanasia of treatable, adoptable dogs and cats in maricopa county through adoption, medical care, promotion of spay & neuter and owner education. hfg also operates a low-cost vaccine/microchip clinic each week to provide…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Everglades Angels Dog Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fostering Success Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUNY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherSUNY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA FOUNDATIONSUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherSUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATIONCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING: $90,000 · OtherCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNINGCOLLEGE OF ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION: $87,900 · OtherCOLLEGE OF ALBEMARLE FOUNDATIONDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $83,000 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC: $61,000 · Other+35 more: $480,217 · Other+35 moreEVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC: $76,100 · AnimalsEVERGLADES ANGE…SPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $58,800 · AnimalsSPCA OF NORTHEA…HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $43,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY …OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $40,000 · AnimalsOUR COMPANIONS …MUTTVILLE: $25,000 · AnimalsMUTTVILLE+1 more: $2,500 · AnimalsGuadalupe Center Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe…THE PANGEA NETWORK: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE PANGE…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC …THE CAROLINAS FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE AND HOME CARE: $5,000 · Human ServicesNAPILI KAI FOUNDATION: $41,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MAASAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $50,000 · EmploymentLASTING FRIENDS INC: $45,000 · InternationalKIVA MICROFUNDS: $2,000 · InternationalBEADS FOR EDUCATION INC: $31,500 · Education
Other$1,207,117Animals$245,400Human Services$145,000Arts & Culture$51,000Employment$50,000International$47,000Education$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC: $76,100 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC: $61,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $58,800 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLASTING FRIENDS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetTHE PANGEA NETWORK: $45,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $43,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNAPILI KAI FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetOUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBEADS FOR EDUCATION INC: $31,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCHILD'S PATH INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAKOLA PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAASAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CAROLINAS FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE AND HOME CARE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LASTING FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PANGEA NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds NAPILI KAI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEADS FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD'S PATH INC ↗
  • Who funds AKOLA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE MAASAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING SUCCESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center: 10% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc?

Find your warmest path to Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home