Skip to content
Perigee Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Perigee Fund

Our mission is to shift policies and systems to increasingly value and embed supports for caregiver and infant mental health in the places where families are during pregnancy and early childhood.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
64
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$38MHealth$28MPhilanthropy$13MEducation$8.1MCivil Rights$5.9MYouth Development$5.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.5MEmployment$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $4.7M
  • $250k+23 grants · $14M
$200,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$3,712,989
ZERO TO THREE$2,500,000
GIVEDIRECTLY$700,000
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$675,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
FIRST 5 FUNDEMENTALS$500,000
MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND$500,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS$500,000
YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING-SNOHOMISH COUNTY$400,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION$314,411
GEEARS GEORGIA EARLY EDUCATION ALLIANCE FOR READY STUDENTS INC$250,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$250,000
ST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK$250,000
LA COCINA$250,000
POLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $31.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ZERO TO THREE: $4.5M → 14%TODDLER LEARNING CENTER: $70k → 7%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $100k → 9%BRIGID COLLINS HOUSE: $75k → 12%YOUTH AND FAMILY LINK: $50k → 13%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%LA CASA HOGAR: $305k → 17%ROOM ONE: $75k → 17%ZERO TO THREE: $4.3M → 14%TODDLER LEARNING CENTER: $70k → 7%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $100k → 9%BRIGID COLLINS HOUSE: $75k → 12%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $70k → 12%YOUTH AND FAMILY LINK: $50k → 13%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%ROOM ONE: $75k → 17%ZERO TO THREE: $4.3M → 14%CHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL OF THURSTON COUNTY: $60k → 9%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $92k → 9%FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $70k → 12%ZERO TO THREE: $4.0M → 14%CHILD CARE ACTION COUNCIL OF THURSTON COUNTY: $60k → 9%ZERO TO THREE: $3.0M → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $2.5M → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $508k → 14%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $100k → 14%YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $400k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE - KING COUNTY - SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $385k → 9%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $125k → 17%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $290k → 17%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $87k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $115k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $100k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $75k → 17%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $75k → 9%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $75k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE - KING COUNTY - SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $500k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $1.1M → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $750k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $200k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $53k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON: $200k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $60k → 9%AMARA: $69k → 9%AMARA: $60k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $200k → 9%AMARA: $60k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $80k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Perigee Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 48% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 42%.

Perigee Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77M · 96 repeat orgs$9.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

96 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2024, 62 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
70

Total granted

$77M
$5.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+29%

Still filing today

95%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZT
    ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $23M · revenue +57%
  • ME
    MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +125%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +22% · 43% of their budget

Funded once

  • WC
    WASHINGTON CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $511k · revenue +103% · 45% of their budget
  • CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY
    one grant, 2019 · $475k · revenue -48%
  • ES
    EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENTHUMAN RESOURCE
    one grant, 2020 · $411k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brightspark Early Learning Services

To nurture and sustain child-centered, antiracist early learning communities.Our work is to:1) Help families access high quality childcare and after-school care.2) Increase the availability of high-quality care through coaching and…

Human Services
2
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
3
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
4
Pro-Choice Washington

To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building

—
5
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
6
Project Access Northwest

Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.

Health
7
Washington Progress Fund

Washington Progress Fund is building a permanent and powerful social change movement in Washington state supported by a network of committed donors. WPF envisions a Washington state where government serves the public interest and we all…

Philanthropy
8
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
9
Oregon Health and Education Collaborative

Support place-based, cross-sector collaboration between healthcare and education partners to make a systemic change and achieve positive outcomes for all of oregon's youth.

Health
10
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation

The Pro-Choice Washington Foundation is our 501c3 focused on issue research, leadership development, and community and decision-maker education.

Civil Rights
11
Eastside Pathways

Giving every child the opportunity to thrive from cradle to career requires dedication and teamwork. eastside pathways helps individuals and organizations collaborate to focus their efforts, increase equity, decrease harm, and drive…

Education
12
Washington State Family and Community Engagement Trust

Washington Family Engagement fosters social transformation by supporting the development of mulitgenerational leaders from diverse backgrounds to become actively engaged in schools and communities in Washington State.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Home Society of Washington; the most unlike its peers is Smith-Barbieri Progressive Fund a Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

189 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 189 of the 207 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

21
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
184/189
Grantees still filing
136/189
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $23,133,310 · Human ServicesZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR IN…OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $2,053,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICESYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $1,785,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION O…+44 more: $6,152,722 · Human Services+44 moreSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $9,040,753 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $3,865,000 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUNDGroundswell Fund: $3,250,000 · PhilanthropyGroundswell FundROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $3,010,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY …Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $2,771,610 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community …+16 more: $1,549,500 · Philanthropy+16 morePERINATAL SUPPORT WASHINGTON: $1,905,000 · HealthPERINATAL SU…HEALTHCONNECT ONE: $1,340,000 · HealthHEALTHCONNEC…MATERNAL MENTAL HEALTH LDRSHP ALLIANCE: $1,260,000 · HealthMATERNAL MEN…2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL: $1,153,500 · Health2020 MOM POL…EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $705,600 · HealthEVERGREEN RE…COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COALITION: $672,012 · HealthCOMMUNITY HE…LA COCINA: $650,000 · HealthLA COCINAWASHINGTON CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $510,976 · HealthALLIANCE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INFANT MENTAL HEALTH: $510,000 · Health+20 more: $3,133,023 · Health+20 moreWASHINGTON STATE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY: $1,583,128 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE H…START EARLY: $1,550,000 · OtherSTART EARLYPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL: $1,030,200 · OtherPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT…SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $986,821 · OtherSOUTHWEST HUMAN DE…WASHINGTON STATE CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL NETWORK DBA CHILD CARE AWARE WA: $863,000 · OtherONEAMERICA: $1,400,000 · OtherONEAMERICANa'ah Illahee Fund: $633,077 · Other+69 more: $9,245,526 · Other+69 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,012,048 · EducationUNIVERSIT…UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,771,500 · EducationUNIVERSIT…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $950,000 · EducationGEORGETOW…Washington State Association of Head State and ECEA Programs: $675,000 · EducationWashingto…Pathwaves Washington: $600,000 · EducationPathwaves…Southeast Seattle Education Coalition: $496,000 · EducationSoutheast…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $360,000 · EducationYale University: $299,120 · EducationErikson Institute: $295,000 · Education+9 more: $1,297,250 · Education+9 moreFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE: $2,650,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS: $2,027,358 · Youth DevelopmentVOICES OF TOMORROW: $1,361,178 · Youth DevelopmentSPOKANE TRIBAL NETWORK: $572,130 · Youth DevelopmentBaby Cakes and Brunch: $900,000 · Community ImprovementRVC SEATTLE: $618,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $600,000 · Community ImprovementEconomic Opportunity Institute: $370,000 · Community ImprovementNONPROFIT FINANCE FUND: $350,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$33,124,032Philanthropy$23,486,863Health$11,840,111Other$17,291,752Education$8,755,918Youth Development$6,610,666Community Improvement$2,838,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $23,133,310 over 6y, 11% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $9,040,753 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $3,865,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetGroundswell Fund: $3,250,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $3,010,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $2,771,610 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE: $2,650,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $2,053,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetFIRST FIVE FUNDAMENTALS: $2,027,358 over 4y, 25% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,012,048 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPERINATAL SUPPORT WASHINGTON: $1,905,000 over 6y, 56% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $1,785,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,771,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSTART EARLY: $1,550,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetONEAMERICA: $1,400,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetVOICES OF TOMORROW: $1,361,178 over 3y, 17% of budgetHEALTHCONNECT ONE: $1,340,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetMATERNAL MENTAL HEALTH LDRSHP ALLIANCE: $1,260,000 over 5y, 94% of budget2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL: $1,153,500 over 5y, 36% of budgetPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL: $1,030,200 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $986,821 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $950,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaby Cakes and Brunch: $900,000 over 5y, 63% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL NETWORK DBA CHILD CARE AWARE WA: $863,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetEVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $705,600 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $700,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWashington State Association of Head State and ECEA Programs: $675,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COALITION: $672,012 over 3y, 37% of budgetLA COCINA: $650,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetNa'ah Illahee Fund: $633,077 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetRVC SEATTLE: $618,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPathwaves Washington: $600,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $600,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSPOKANE TRIBAL NETWORK: $572,130 over 3y, 48% of budgetTTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $552,082 over 4y, 66% of budgetWASHINGTON CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $510,976 over 1y, 45% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INFANT MENTAL HEALTH: $510,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetHUMMINGBIRD INDIGENOUS FAMILY SERVICES: $500,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetSoutheast Seattle Education Coalition: $496,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY: $474,922 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $464,581 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH: $403,134 over 3y, 40% of budgetINDIGO CULTURAL CENTER: $400,000 over 2y, 96% of budgetLA CASA HOGAR: $397,250 over 3y, 17% of budgetPHILANTHROPY IN ACTION: $385,500 over 2y, 47% of budgetMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $382,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHAWAII ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH: $375,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetEconomic Opportunity Institute: $370,000 over 4y, 8.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationInatai FoundationMedina FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Philanthropy NorthwestThe Norcliffe Foundat…Multicare Health Syst…Stolte Family Foundat…School's Out Washingt…United Way of King Co…The Satterberg Founda…Kaiser Foundation Hea…
Seattle FoundationWA99.6× affinity95 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Medina Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · The Norcliffe Foundation · Multicare Health System · Stolte Family Foundation · School's Out Washington · United Way of King County · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perigee Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perigee Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
86report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Perigee Fund?

Find your warmest path to Perigee Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 207 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Perigee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home