Skip to content

· Private foundation

Penny Lima Newhouse Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0166% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$20kYouth Development$13kEducation$9kCommunity Improvement$6kPublic Benefit$5kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$206
Median grant
4
States reached
$400k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,950
BRAVER ANGELS$1,750
ADVANCED YOUTH OUTREACH$500
CAROLINA BEACH OCEAN RESCUE$312
COMPASSION & CHOICES$258
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$250
Individual grant recipient$206
JEFF GORDON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$104
Individual grant recipient$100
JOHN LOCKE FOUNDATION$100
BIKERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING$100
UNCW$90
Individual grant recipient$75
Individual grant recipient$40
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRAVER ANGELS: $2k → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $1k → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $500 → 17%STEVE HAYDU ST PATRICK'S LO TIDE FD: $96 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 20 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
19

Total granted

$59k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+6%

Still filing today

30%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $681 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • BA
    Braver AngelsInc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +28%
  • The Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LINCOLN
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue -19%
  • UP
    UNC-TV PUBLIC MEDIA NC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • KM
    KIDS MAKING IT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
2
The Charleston Museum

To educate Charleston area residents and visitors about the natural and cultural history of the South Carolina Lowcountry through collections, exhibitions, preservation, conservation, research and related programming.

Arts & Culture
3
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
4
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
5
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
6
Hudson Institute Inc

Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future.

—
7
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Wireless Research Center of North Carolina

The Wireless Research Center is an independent, private nonprofit research center dedicated to applied research and engineering. Located in North Carolina's Research Triangle region, the WRC helps clients from around the world develop…

Science & Tech
10
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
11
Fernbank Inc

Fernbank museum of natural history inspires a lifelong learning of natural history through immersive programming and unmatched experiences to encourage a greater appreciation of our planet and its inhabitants. fernbank is dedicated to…

Arts & Culture
12
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Advance Youth Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BELLAMY MANSION MUSEUM OF HISTORY: $12,500 · OtherBELLAMY MANSION MUSEUM OF HISTORYIndividual grant recipient: $11,940 · OtherIndividual grant recipientADVANCED YOUTH OUTREACH: $5,500 · OtherADVANCED YOUTH OUTREACHThe Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina Inc: $2,400 · OtherUNC CENTER FOR PUBLIC TELEVISION: $2,180 · Other+28 more: $10,784 · Other+28 moreFRIENDS OF LINCOLN: $9,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF LI…+1 more: $90 · EducationADVANCE YOUTH OUTREACH: $5,800 · Youth DevelopmentADVANCE Y…CAMP 42: $800 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP 42WOODSON CENTER: $5,952 · Community ImprovementJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,500 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $1,250 · Public BenefitBraver AngelsInc: $3,250 · Human Services+1 more: $96 · Human ServicesLOUISE WELLS CAMERON ART MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Wilmington Foundation Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureSTORYCORPS INC: $104 · Arts & Culture
Other$45,304Education$9,090Youth Development$6,600Community Improvement$5,952Public Benefit$4,750Human Services$3,346Arts & Culture$1,604

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF LINCOLN: $9,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $5,952 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCE YOUTH OUTREACH: $5,800 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBraver AngelsInc: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina Inc: $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $1,274 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS MAKING IT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISE WELLS CAMERON ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Wilmington Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJeff Gordon Childrens Foundation: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORYCORPS INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHN LOCKE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNCW CORPORATION: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEARCH: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LINCOLN ↗
  • Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE YOUTH OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Braver AngelsInc ↗
  • Who funds The Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds KIDS MAKING IT INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISE WELLS CAMERON ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CAMP 42 ↗
  • Who funds FIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Historic Wilmington Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercatus Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jeff Gordon Childrens Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STORYCORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN LOCKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEVE HAYDU ST PATRICK'S LO TIDE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNCW CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC18.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · The Landfall Foundation Inc · Ags Charitable Trust Uad May 21 1965 · Stein Family Charitable Foundation · New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · Dan Cameron Family Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Penny Lima Newhouse Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Penny Lima Newhouse Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Penny Lima Newhouse’s filings →

    More from the funding graph