Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Penniman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$62kHealth$45kAnimals$26kEducation$24kHuman Services$17kPublic Benefit$9kPhilanthropy$7kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$389k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL FUND$5,000
MAYO CLINIC$5,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$3,000
UNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE BUNCOMBE COUNTY$3,000
HEARTS WITH HANDS ASHEVILLE NC$2,000
CATO INSTITUTE$1,500
FSGA FOUNDATION$1,000
ASHEVILLE SCHOOL$1,000
KENT DENVER FUND$1,000
SOS FOUNDATION$1,000
PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION$500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$500
DAVE MILLER MEMORIAL FUND$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC HOSPICE INC: $500 → 15%ALEXANDRA'S ANGELS MS FOUNDATION: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$170k · 16 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
29

Total granted

$170k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+37%

Still filing today

50%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue +30%
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $9k · revenue +71%
  • SA
    St Anne's Episcopal School Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BIG BEAR ALPINE ZOO
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR THE ARTS MIZNER PARK
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
2
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
Humane Society of Greater Miami-Dade for Pocta Aap

Matching furry friends with their purr-fect homes & offering affordable spay/neuter.

Animals
5
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
6
Southwest Florida Spay Neuter Serv

The organization is run by a veterinarian with a small staff to provide affordable care to pet owners, animal rescue organizations and work in cooperation with trap-neuter-vaccinate-release providers to control feral cat populations.

Animals
7
Safe Haven for Cats

The mission of safe haven for cats is to use no-kill principles and education to save cats' lives through rescue, adoption, spay/neuter services and community programs.

Animals
8
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
9
Flagler Humane Society Inc

We transform the lives of animals with compassionate care and services, outstanding educational programs, and advocacy for all animals.

Animals
10
Spca Inc

Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…

Animals
11
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
12
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Hospice Inc and the most unlike its peers is Place of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Veteran Support ServicesHospice Care ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Land Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%58%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION — $62,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATIONBOCA RATON COMM HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $16,400 · OtherBOCA RATON COMM HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $13,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCMAYO CLINIC — $11,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICSOS FOUNDATION — $6,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF BIG BEAR ALPINE ZOO — $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANNUAL FUND — $6,000 · Other+23 more — $29,875 · Other+23 moreFERAL CAT CARETAKERS COALITION — $12,000 · AnimalsFERAL CAT …HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $2,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOC…ACTORS AND OTHERS FOR ANIMALS — $2,000 · AnimalsACTORS AND…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,000 · Animals+7 more — $2,250 · Animals+7 moreBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $14,100 · Community ImprovementThe Junior Welfare Society — $900 · Community ImprovementCATO INSTITUTE — $8,500 · Public BenefitFSGA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Recreation & SportsPLACE OF HOPE — $1,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC HOSPICE INC — $500 · Human ServicesALEXANDRAS ANGELS MS FOUNDATION INC — $250 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $250 · Health
Other$151,275Animals$19,750Community Improvement$15,000Public Benefit$8,500Recreation & Sports$6,000Human Services$1,750Health$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $14,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFERAL CAT CARETAKERS COALITION — $12,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFSGA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSt Anne's Episcopal School Inc — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTORS AND OTHERS FOR ANIMALS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S OPPORTUNITY GROUP INC — $1,525 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Junior Welfare Society — $900 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPET ADOPTION FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Florida SPCA Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC HOSPICE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian African Leadership Ministries — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE BAY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXANDRAS ANGELS MS FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Penniman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc2% of income from government
  • Catholic Hospice Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph