Skip to content

· Private foundation

Penner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$505kHuman Services$159kArts & Culture$93kYouth Development$21kHealth$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEducation$2kPhilanthropy$964Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chapel Hill United Methodist Church$79,550
Edwards Store$16,000
Carpenter Square Theatre$15,460
Sunbeam Family Services$15,000
Savannah Station$12,600
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT$5,000
Life Choices$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Santas Cause$3,000
Young Life$3,000
SEARCH MINISTRIES$2,000
SKYLINE$2,000
Lyric Theatre$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Savannah Station: $13k → 9%Sunbeam Family Services: $21k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $16k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $15k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $15k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $15k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $5k → 16%Infant Crisis Services: $500 → 16%OK Foundation for Disabled: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$751k · 18 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$751k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+172%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $87k · revenue +45%
  • WP
    WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue +17%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • CH
    Chapel Hill UMC
    one grant, 2020 · $76k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • RO
    RECOVERING OKLAHOMANS AFTER DISASTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +172%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
2
Fostering Sweet Dreams Inc

To provide essential resources to oklahomas most vulnerable children by providing foster families with beds, bedding, carseats, & other furniture.

Human Services
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
4
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
5
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
6
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
7
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
8
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
9
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
10
Casa for Kids Inc

Court appointed special advocates are trained community volunteers appointed by a judge to speak up for abused and neglected children in the court system.

Civil Rights
11
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
12
Child Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc

to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Foundation for the Disabled Inc; the most unlike its peers is Santas Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chapel Hill United Methodist Church: $413,376 · OtherChapel Hill United Methodist ChurchChapel Hill UMC: $75,573 · OtherChapel Hill UMCLife Choices: $51,000 · OtherLife ChoicesIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · Other+16 more: $102,563 · Other+16 moreSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $86,883 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMIL…Savannah Station TRP Incorporation: $12,600 · Human ServicesSavannah Stat…+2 more: $700 · Human ServicesCARPENTER SQUARE THEATRE INC: $50,460 · Arts & CultureCARPENTER…WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $23,620 · Arts & CultureWILLOW PR…YOUNG LIFE: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentRECOVERING OKLAHOMANS AFTER DISASTER INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,775 · EducationLibrary Endowment Trust: $200 · EducationCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $500 · Crime & LegalQUAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$665,512Human Services$100,183Arts & Culture$74,080Youth Development$21,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Education$1,975Crime & Legal$500Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $86,883 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCARPENTER SQUARE THEATRE INC: $50,460 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $23,620 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANTAS CAUSE INC: $14,500 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetSavannah Station TRP Incorporation: $12,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRECOVERING OKLAHOMANS AFTER DISASTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $1,775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLibrary Endowment Trust: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER SQUARE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SANTAS CAUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Savannah Station TRP Incorporation ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERING OKLAHOMANS AFTER DISASTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds QUAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
  • Who funds Library Endowment Trust ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Penner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Penner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Penner’s filings →

More from the funding graph