· Private foundation
Peach Pit Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $186k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| BIRDIES FOR CHARITY | $69,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $55,000 |
| BOSTON COLLEGE LAW INGRID HILLINGER LEGACY FUND | $50,000 |
| COOGINCHAUG LITTLE LEAGUE | $40,000 |
| BUSINESS INDUSTRY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY | $32,500 |
| DURHAM & MIDDLEFIELD FOOTBALL LEAGUE | $30,000 |
| BOCA REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY | $18,000 |
| AFTER THE STORM | $15,000 |
| XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| A LITTLE COMPASSION INC | $7,500 |
| CVEF | $6,000 |
| MIDDLESEX HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBUSINESSINDUSTRY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2025 · $193k · revenue +0%
- CLCoginchaug Little League4× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +25%
- MHMIDDLESEX HOSPITAL7× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- MGMASS GENERALone grant, 2024 · $100k
- BCBOSTON COLLEGE LAW PUBLIC INTEREST LAW FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $75k
- TCTRAVELERS CHAMPIONSHIP BIRDIES FOR CHARITYone grant, 2024 · $67k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
Bristol hospital and health care group is committed to enhancing the health and well-being of our community. we will provide safe, quality care and services to our patients through our continuum of services and health promotion. we will…
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…
The mission of Cheshire Medical Center is to deliver compassionate and exceptional care to all we serve.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Hospital for Special Care is a 236-Bed Rehabilitation and Chronic Disease hospital, serving patients in these primary areas: Inpatient and Outpatient Rehabilitation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Middlesex Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Look for the Good Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BUSINESSINDUSTRY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Coginchaug Little League ↗
- Who funds Middlesex United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds AFTER THE STORM INC ↗
- Who funds Hartford Hospital ↗
- Who funds GILEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDCITY INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 75 INC ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds A LITTLE COMPASSION ↗
- Who funds Project Just Because Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Kitchings Family Foundation · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Middlesex County Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Middlesex United Way Inc · Chelsea Groton Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peach Pit Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Workforce Alliance Inc — 77% of income from government
- Gilead Community Services Inc — 62% of income from government
- Vista Life Innovations Inc — 33% of income from government
- Lymes Youth Service Bureau — 23% of income from government
- Connecticut Science Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Meriden Inc — 10% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- St Vincent Depaul Middletown — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Steam Train Inc — 1% of income from government
- Hartford Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Middlesex Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Project Just Because Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.