Loading…
Loading…
Connecticut · Nonprofit
LOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT INC (Connecticut) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $7,746 in grants to it, the largest being PEACH PIT FOUNDATION ($3,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
LOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT INC is better cushioned than half of the 4,485 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,485 arts & culture nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
99% of LOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (68% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$55 from 1 funders in 2023, up from $3k and 1 in 2019.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of LOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
LOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 93% · 2021 68% · 2022 95% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
LOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT INC draws 61% of its grant income from funders outside Connecticut — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing