Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pauline R Barrett Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$2.9MHealth$700kArts & Culture$400kHuman Services$392kReligion$380kFood & Nutrition$315kRecreation & Sports$200kHousing & Shelter$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $575k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 92% of reported assets are held in Regions.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA$300,000
HOUSE OF HOPE$150,000
NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK$100,000
CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES$100,000
ALLEN COLLEGE$75,000
HW GROUT TRUST$50,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$50,000
YWCA$50,000
GRIN AND GROW$25,000
AMERICAN FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
WATERLOOCEDAR FALLS SYMPHONY$25,000
IOWA LEGAL AID$15,000
LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA$10,000
JOB FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $555k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUCCESSLINK: $25k → 17%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $10k → 17%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $10k → 17%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $10k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE: $200k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE: $100k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE: $100k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 17 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$5.4M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+119%

Still filing today

65%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK
    5× · 2019–2024 · $315k · revenue +44%
  • GM
    GROUT MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $225k · revenue +50%
  • JF
    JOB FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $55k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • SI
    SUCCESSLINK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +119%
  • CO
    CENTER OF ATTENTION
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • LV
    LEADER VALLEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +191%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
2
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
3
Iowa Laborers' Employers Cooperation & Education Trust

Improve communications between employers and local unions.

—
4
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
5
Western Iowa Development Assoc

Facilitate economic opportunity, business success, community engagement, prosperity, and quality of life for rural western iowa

—
6
United Way of Clinton County Iowa

To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.

—
7
Iowa River Hospice Inc

Provide hospice care and bereavement support services.

Human Services
8
Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—
9
Community Foundation for Western Iowa

The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.

Philanthropy
10
Cedar Falls Lutheran Home

Christian caring - enhancing lives through a commitment to individualized care in a home empowered by god's love.

Housing & Shelter
11
Iowa Center Loan Fund

The mission of the iowa center loan fund cdfi is to reduce proverty and inequality and further community development by providing access to capital to iowans starting or expanding a business who do not have access to traditional forms of…

Community Improvement
12
West Central Community Action

In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of Eastern Iowa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hw Grout Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA: $2,150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWAALLEN COLLEGE: $575,000 · OtherALLEN COLLEGEFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $350,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHYWCA: $270,000 · OtherYWCACITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $200,000 · OtherWATERLOOCEDAR FALLS SYMPHONY: $175,000 · Other+10 more: $263,500 · Other+10 moreCEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesCEDAR VALLE…LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SE…SUCCESSLINK INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK: $315,000 · Food & NutritionGROUT MUSEUM INC: $225,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSE OF HOPE: $195,000 · HealthGRIN & GROW LTD: $125,000 · EducationJOB FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationIowa Legal Aid: $25,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,983,500Human Services$555,000Food & Nutrition$315,000Arts & Culture$225,000Health$195,000Education$180,000Crime & Legal$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLEN COLLEGE: $575,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $500,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK: $315,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGROUT MUSEUM INC: $225,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE: $195,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetGRIN & GROW LTD: $125,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetHW GROUT TRUST: $100,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJOB FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIowa Legal Aid: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLEN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GROUT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds GRIN & GROW LTD ↗
  • Who funds HW GROUT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds JOB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
  • Who funds SUCCESSLINK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable FoundationIA36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation · Otto Schoitz Foundation · Lsb Foundation · Van G Miller Family Charitable Foundation · Cedar Valley United Way · Charlotte and William Hinson Charitable Foundation Trust · Black Hawk County Gaming Association · The Gallagher Family Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · R J McElroy Trust · The Braun Family Foundation · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pauline R Barrett Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pauline R Barrett Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pauline R Barrett Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pauline R Barrett Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pauline R Barrett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph