· Public charity
Cedar Valley United Way
Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 38 grants below total $1,341,063 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,371,765 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,702 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $548k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $463k
- $250k+1 grant · $284k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLEN HOSPITAL | $283,632 |
| SUCCESSLINK | $111,000 |
| PEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC | $92,392 |
| OPERATION THRESHOLD | $77,829 |
| GRIN & GROW LTD | $64,700 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $61,642 |
| 1619 FREEDOM SCHOOL | $55,000 |
| CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY | $48,914 |
| RIVERVIEW CENTER INC | $40,270 |
| IOWA JAG INC | $38,162 |
| YWCA | $36,400 |
| PATHWAYS BEHAVIORAL SERVICES | $33,872 |
| NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK | $33,694 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARHIDIOCE SE OF DUBUQUE | $28,200 |
| ONE CEDAR VALLEY | $27,911 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +66%
- SISUCCESSLINK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $879k · revenue +119%
- PCPEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC8× · 2017–2024 · $853k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- MCMID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +14%
- ATASPIRE TRP INCone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.
Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.
The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.
To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…
To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.
To improve health and wellbeing by providing healthcare services to people in their homes and throughout our community.
To provide high-quality and compassionate care to community members approaching the end of life.
To promote social, economic and environmental justice.
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waypoint Services and the most unlike its peers is Grin & Grow Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 55. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 8% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 4% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SUCCESSLINK INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION THRESHOLD INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GRIN & GROW LTD ↗
- Who funds BLACK HAWK-GRUNDY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS BEHAVIORAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST IOWA AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds Riverview Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO VISITING NURSING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST IOWA ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Dubuque ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF IOWA CASA & ICFCRB ↗
- Who funds COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY PRESCHOOL & CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY YMCA OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds JESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JOB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FCFH-IOWA INC D/B/A UNITED WAY 2-1-1 ↗
- Who funds NAMI BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 1619 FREEDOM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NORTH STAR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Schoitz Foundation · Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation · Lsb Foundation · Black Hawk County Gaming Association · R J McElroy Trust · Van G Miller Family Charitable Foundation · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · Greenstate Foundation · Trustage Foundation Inc · Duroe Family Foundation · The Gallagher Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cedar Valley United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.