Skip to content
Paul Grossinger & Rose Grossinger Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Paul Grossinger & Rose Grossinger Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$180kPhilanthropy$93kReligion$20kArts & Culture$14kHealth$9kCivil Rights$6kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$16,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$10,000
LINCOLNWOOD JEWISH CONGREGATION A G BETH ISRAEL$2,180
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$800
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$600
SHALVA$500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA$200
THE ARK$100
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMIA SOCIETY$100
JEWISH SACRED SOCIETY$100
STEVEN A TEITELBAUM FAMILY FOUNDATION$100
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $250 → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $250 → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $250 → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $200 → 6%SHALVA: $1k → 14%SHALVA: $1k → 14%SHALVA: $800 → 14%SHALVA: $600 → 14%SHALVA: $600 → 14%SHALVA: $500 → 14%SHALVA: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Paul Grossinger & Rose Grossinger Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 84%.

Paul Grossinger & Rose Grossinger Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$308k · 26 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
23

Total granted

$308k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+50%

Still filing today

62%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2020–2024 · $163k · revenue +198%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    5× · 2018–2024 · $75k · revenue +34%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • PA
    PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $540
  • CW
    CANCER WELLNESS CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
2
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
3
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
7
University of Judaism Foundation
—
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Physicians for Palestine
Health
10
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Health Clinical Operations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
32/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $162,600 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $11,760 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES+7 more: $10,292 · International+7 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $74,579 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $6,160 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH …+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyLINCOLNWOOD JEWISH CONGREGATION A G BETH ISRAEL: $14,246 · OtherLINCOLNWOOD JE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $11,925 · OtherJEWISH FEDERAT…WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $4,650 · OtherWORLD JEWISH C…THE ARK: $3,100 · OtherTHE ARKLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMIA SOCIETY: $1,700 · OtherHADASSAH WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $1,468 · Other+16 more: $6,276 · Other+16 moreThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $7,500 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $5,270 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $1,250 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $425 · Arts & CultureSHALVA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $950 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc: $900 · HealthCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $500 · HealthFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $250 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $225 · HealthALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $200 · HealthAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $200 · HealthEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $150 · Health+6 more: $600 · HealthJEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC: $900 · Religion
International$184,652Philanthropy$80,789Other$43,365Arts & Culture$14,445Human Services$5,950Health$3,025Religion$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $162,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $74,579 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $11,925 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $11,760 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $6,160 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $5,270 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,054 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC: $900 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $346 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER FUND INC A NJ NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul Grossinger & Rose Grossinger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul Grossinger & Rose Grossinger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul Grossinger & Rose Grossinger’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home