Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul & Monica Bancroft Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$426kHuman Services$421kYouth Development$310kEducation$227kHousing & Shelter$105kHealth$85kEnvironment$84kReligion$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $252k
$16,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LAUREL CENTER$30,000
STANDUP FOR KIDS$26,000
URBAN VOICES PROJECT$25,000
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE$22,500
WINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC$22,000
ABC HOUSE$18,000
WELL$17,000
SKYLIGHT THEATRE COMPANY$16,000
NEW EARTH ORGANIZATION$16,000
BETHLEHEM INN$16,000
MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT$15,000
THE CANCER RESOURCE CTR OF MENDOCINO$15,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE$13,000
CONCERN HOTLINE$8,500
MICHAELS DAUGHTER FUND$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABC HOUSE: $20k → 13%ABC HOUSE: $18k → 13%ABC HOUSE: $16k → 13%ABC HOUSE: $16k → 13%ABC HOUSE: $15k → 13%ABC HOUSE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 15 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$1.6M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+13%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • StandUp for Kids
    7× · 2019–2025 · $179k · revenue +76%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $151k · revenue +19%
  • WD
    WINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $139k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • WC
    WILLITS COMM SVCS AND FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • MS
    MANZANITA SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Narrative

From clinical care and peer support programs to housing, we provide resources so people seeking mental health care can develop the tools to thrive, not just survive.

Human Services
2
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
3
Breakthru House Inc

Transforming lives of women struggling with drug and alcohol addiction by providing a long-term residential program to experience physical, emotional and spiritual healing through recovery. as the first long-term residential recovery…

Health
4
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
5
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
6
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
7
Welcome House Inc

Welcome house provides a continuum of services to end homelessness and promote stability for each person we serve.

Housing & Shelter
8
Meta House Inc

Meta house ends the generational cycle of addiction by healing women and strengthening families.

—
9
Second Thought Theatre

Second Thought Theatre provides an intimate and unique theatrical experience by empowering top local artists to take risks and by showcasing writers who boldly tackle the difficult and demanding questions of our rapidly changing world.

Arts & Culture
10
Sage Advocacy Center

Educate, advocate, and empower to end violence.

—
11
The Actors Center Inc

Creative residency programs, artist development workshops, advanced training opportunities, and mentorship for professional actors and people who wish to participate in the performing arts.

Arts & Culture
12
Vera House Inc

Vera house, inc. prevents, responds to and partners to end domestic and sexual violence and other forms of abuse.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Skylight Theatre Company; the most unlike its peers is Manzanita Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

StandUp for Kids: $178,800 · OtherStandUp for KidsWINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC: $138,500 · OtherWINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INCTHE CANCER RESOURCE CTR OF MENDOCINO: $85,000 · OtherTHE CANCER RESOURCE CTR OF MENDOCINOMONARCH HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT: $73,700 · OtherMONARCH HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $60,500 · OtherCONCERN HOTLINE INC+3 more: $37,900 · Other+3 moreSKYLIGHT THEATRE COMPANY: $154,500 · Arts & CultureSKYLIGHT THEATRE COMPANYTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $150,800 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTENEW EARTH ORGANIZATION: $131,000 · Arts & CultureNEW EARTH ORGANIZATIONTHE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPANY: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE CO…+1 more: $2,400 · Arts & CultureTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $251,500 · Human ServicesTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTI…ABC HOUSE INC: $94,000 · Human ServicesABC HOUSE INCURBAN VOICES PROJECT: $88,000 · Human ServicesURBAN VOICES PROJECTBETHLEHEM INN: $105,400 · Housing & ShelterEarth Island Institute Inc: $83,500 · EnvironmentTHE WELL INC: $17,000 · ReligionMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $15,000 · EducationMANZANITA SERVICES INC: $10,500 · Health
Other$574,400Arts & Culture$468,700Human Services$433,500Housing & Shelter$105,400Environment$83,500Religion$17,000Education$15,000Health$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $251,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetStandUp for Kids: $178,800 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetSKYLIGHT THEATRE COMPANY: $154,500 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $150,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC: $138,500 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetNEW EARTH ORGANIZATION: $131,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $105,400 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetABC HOUSE INC: $94,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN VOICES PROJECT: $88,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $83,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $60,500 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetTHE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPANY: $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANZANITA SERVICES INC: $10,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHEDGEBROOK: $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds StandUp for Kids ↗
  • Who funds SKYLIGHT THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW EARTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
  • Who funds ABC HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN VOICES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN HOTLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE WELL INC ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MANZANITA SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEDGEBROOK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul & Monica Bancroft Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul & Monica Bancroft Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Abc House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paul & Monica Bancroft Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Paul & Monica Bancroft Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul & Monica Bancroft Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph