· Private foundation
Patrick & Susan Keefe Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Healthy Moms & Babies | $80,000 |
| University of Iowa | $64,500 |
| Friends of Batahola | $55,000 |
| CAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN CORPS | $25,000 |
| St Agnes Outreach Services Day Room - Nurses Center | $15,000 |
| Catholic Charities of Philadelphia | $15,000 |
| SOME INC | $15,000 |
| Catholic Relief Services | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY | $10,000 |
| Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio | $10,000 |
| ANNIE'S HOME | $10,000 |
| Immaculate Heart of Mary Parish | $7,000 |
| Immaculate Heart of Mary Parish | $7,000 |
| Immaculate Heart of Mary Parish | $5,750 |
| La Posada PROVIDENCIA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHealthy Moms & Babes Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $216k · revenue +27%
- HFHOPE FOR KABINGO INC6× · 2019–2024 · $61k · revenue +30%
- TTTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF IOWA CENTER OF ADVANCEMENTone grant, 2019 · $210k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF PHARMACYone grant, 2020 · $110k
- FIFORKIDS INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.
Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance
House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…
To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.
Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.
The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.
In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.
To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Beyond Borders and the most unlike its peers is United Mission to Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Healthy Moms & Babes Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR KABINGO INC ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ANNIE'S HOME ↗
- Who funds Capuchin Franciscan Volunteer Corps ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Justice Initiative Inc ↗
- Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds FABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA LATINO CENTER OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DC RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds IOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Cpps Heritage Mission Fund · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Bob & Felicia Burger Family Foundation · Williams Foundation · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc · The Scripps Howard Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Patrick & Susan Keefe Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Little Sisters of the Poor Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.