Skip to content
Patrick & Beatrice Haggerty Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Patrick & Beatrice Haggerty Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.6MEducation$1.7MHuman Services$937kArts & Culture$882kHousing & Shelter$246kReligion$172kCrime & Legal$95kYouth Development$94kOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $128k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $326k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $119k
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$7,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HEALTH$250,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$250,000
BISHOP DUNNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$69,250
Individual grant recipient$50,000
NEXUS$44,250
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HAGGERTY MUSEUM$40,000
EQUEST$30,000
VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION$25,000
ST MARY OF CARMEL CATHOLIC SCHOOL$25,000
DALLAS MUSEUM OF ART$25,000
OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP$22,000
DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER$20,000
HOUSING CRISIS CENTER$15,000
CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL$13,375
HOPE COTTAGE$13,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $429k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $500 → 15%THE FIRST 72: $4k → 23%THE FIRST 72: $3k → 23%THE FIRST 72: $1k → 23%HOPE COTTAGE: $13k → 14%SUNSHINE HOUSE: $4k → 8%SUNSHINE HOUSE: $3k → 8%HOPE COTTAGE: $5k → 14%DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JULIETTE FOWLER HOMES: $25k → 14%OURCALLING: $5k → 14%JONATHAN'S PLACE: $5k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $100k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $65k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $60k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $50k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%BRIGHTER TOMORROWS: $5k → 14%FAMILY PLACE: $5k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $5k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $5k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $5k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $3k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 69 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
32

Total granted

$6.6M
$387k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+19%

Still filing today

51%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Family Place
    6× · 2017–2023 · $290k · revenue +6%
  • NR
    Nexus Recovery Center Incorporated
    5× · 2019–2024 · $129k · revenue +43%
  • E
    EQUEST
    5× · 2019–2024 · $124k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CP
    CISTERCIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • DC
    DALLAS CASAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +44%
  • JF
    JULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope's Door New Beginning Center

The mission of hope's door new beginning center is to offer intervention and prevention services to individuals and families affected by intimate partner and family violence and to provide education programs that enhance the community's…

Human Services
2
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
3
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
4
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
5
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal
6
Operation Care International Inc

Operation care international exists to glorify god. in obedience to his will, we connect impoverished children and the homeless to jesus christ providing for their physical needs through god's provision both at home and abroad.

Human Services
7
Dependency Advocacy Center

Dependency advocacy center (dac) provides zealous legal representation to indigent clients in the juvenile dependency system to promote timely reunification and preservation of families in a safe, healthy environment. dac believes that…

Crime & Legal
8
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Beacon of Downtown Houston

To provide essential and next-step services to restore hope and help end homelessness in houston.

Health
10
Denver Children's Advocacy Center

Dcac works to improve the lives of children traumatized by sexual abuse, neglect and violence-as well as those who are at high-risk with prevention, education, and direct services. our mission is to prevent abuse strengthen families…

Employment
11
Elevate North Texas

Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…

Health
12
Bridge Steps

To empower adults experiencing homelessness in dallas with the tools to homeless recovery as they move into sustainable housing.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center; the most unlike its peers is Mondo Bizarro Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/62
Grantees still filing
48/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $1,095,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $1,036,875 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERBISHOP DUNNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC: $729,000 · OtherBISHOP DUNNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL INCPENINSULA PLAYERS: $546,250 · OtherPENINSULA PLAYERSST MARY OF CARMEL SCHOOL INC: $287,264 · OtherCISTERCIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $200,000 · Other+71 more: $2,008,252 · Other+71 moreThe Family Place: $290,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SUPPLY CO: $28,000 · Human ServicesJULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesHOPE COTTAGE INC: $18,375 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE: $17,500 · Human Services+6 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $129,250 · HealthDOOR COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $104,000 · HealthMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $40,000 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY NORTH TEXAS: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $3,250 · HealthUniversity of Dallas: $70,000 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $70,000 · EducationDoor County YMCA INC: $44,750 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 · Education+2 more: $10,000 · EducationTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $116,500 · PhilanthropyYouth With Faces: $55,000 · PhilanthropyDallas Museum of Art: $25,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC: $13,500 · Arts & CultureFOR LOVE & ART: $13,000 · Arts & CultureNEW ORLEANS MUSICIANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Arts & CultureRoots of Music Inc: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC: $44,625 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE: $18,125 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · Environment
Other$5,902,641Human Services$428,875Health$286,500Education$217,250Philanthropy$171,500Arts & Culture$67,500Environment$63,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Family Place: $290,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $135,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $129,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEQUEST: $123,966 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $116,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDOOR COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $104,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYouth With Faces: $55,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $50,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDoor County YMCA INC: $44,750 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC: $44,625 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $41,075 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC: $36,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHOME POINT: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS CASA: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC: $30,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $28,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRISE ADVENTURES INC: $21,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH-TECH HIGH HEELS: $20,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetHOPE COTTAGE INC: $18,375 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE: $18,125 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOL: $16,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetDALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC: $13,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOR LOVE & ART: $13,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $12,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 571 CIRCLE TEN COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY NORTH TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MUSICIANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe First 72: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDC PRESERVATION LEAGUE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSUNSHINE HOUSE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRoots of Music Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY RIVER MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOURCALLING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Nexus Recovery Center Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds EQUEST ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds University of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth With Faces ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Door County YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME POINT ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
  • Who funds PEDIPLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationCommunities Foundatio…United Way of Metropo…Theodore and Beulah B…W P & Bulah Luse Foun…Texas Instruments Fou…Hoblitzelle FoundationThe Rees-Jones Founda…Hillcrest FoundationGil and Dody Weaver F…Craig and Kathryn Hal…Texas Women's Foundat…
The Dallas FoundationTX46.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patrick & Beatrice Haggerty Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patrick & Beatrice Haggerty Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Patrick & Beatrice Haggerty’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home