Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pasternak Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$236k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$832kEducation$358kArts & Culture$243kCommunity Improvement$112kHousing & Shelter$65kInternational$37kHealth$27kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$3,600
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY CHABAD$115,000
SUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION$45,000
HAVAYAH CENTER$19,000
CATSKILL REVITALIZATION CORP$10,000
MARK PROJECT FLEISCHMANNS FIRST$10,000
ARTS IN COLLECTIVE$5,000
KABBALAH CENTRE INTERNATIONAL$5,000
YJP OF HOBOKEN & JERSEY CITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY$3,600
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE$2,500
CATSKILL WATER DISCOVERY CENTER- HANFORD MILLS MUSEUM$2,000
MARGARETVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$2,000
CETANA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION (MYANMAR)$2,000
GARDENS OF AVON BY THE SEA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $9k → 16%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $2k → 16%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $5k → 7%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $4k → 7%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $3k → 7%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $2k → 7%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 46% of Pasternak Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 37% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 4%.

Pasternak Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 26 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
35

Total granted

$1.6M
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+3%

Still filing today

31%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    SUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $330k · revenue +129%
  • MP
    M-ARK PROJECT INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $62k · revenue +148%
  • HS
    HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN & WALLKILL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +34% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • HV
    HUDSON VALLEY INTL FESTIVAL OF THE VOICE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • IF
    ISHA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +155%
  • BC
    Belleayre Conservatory Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
2
Beth Israel Medical Center

Since its founding, over 120 years ago, as a medical dispensary to meet the needs of the impoverished and underserved jewish community of the lower east side, beth israel medical center has been committed to the care of persons of all…

Health
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
6
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
7
The Bachmann-Strauss Dystonia & Parkinson Foundation of Mount Sinai Inc

The foundation was established in 1995 to raise funds to find better treatments and cures for the movement disorders associated with dystonia and parkinson's disease and for medical research related to these diseases.

Philanthropy
8
Institute of Human Relations of the American Jewish Committee

To reduce and eliminate group prejudice and group discrimination and to encourage healthy intergroup, inter-racial, inter-religious and other human relationships.

International
9
Hebrew Health Care Foundation Inc

Managing endowment funds for hebrew health care and affiliates.

—
10
The Jerusalem Connection
—
11
American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro Inc

The american friends of beit issie shapiro (afobis) is a national not for profit fundraising organization with regional offices in new york city, north miami beach, fl and los angeles, ca. afobis is dedicated to supporting beit issie…

Human Services
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Home Foundation of North Jersey; the most unlike its peers is The Onyx and Breezy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY CHABAD INC: $529,800 · OtherVALLEY CHABAD INCSUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION INC: $330,000 · OtherSUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION INCPHOENICIA INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL OF THE VOICE: $137,500 · OtherPHOENICIA INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL OF THE VOICEHAVAYAH CENTRE INC: $93,300 · OtherHAVAYAH CENTRE INCMARK PROJECT FLEISCHMANNS FIRST: $80,000 · OtherKABBALAH CENTRE INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $60,500 · OtherKEHILAT ROMEMU: $56,440 · OtherYJP OF HOBOKEN AND JERSEY CITY INC: $53,600 · Other+45 more: $228,756 · Other+45 moreM-ARK PROJECT INC: $62,000 · Community ImprovementCATSKILL REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $20,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $14,100 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $10,800 · Human ServicesARTS INN COLLECTIVE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureALL STARS PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureISHA FOUNDATION INC: $14,200 · EducationBEN PORAT YOSEF INC: $1,500 · EducationPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthMARY'S PLACE BY THE SEA INC: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,000 · Health
Other$1,569,896Community Improvement$82,000Human Services$24,900Arts & Culture$17,000Education$15,700Philanthropy$15,250Health$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION INC: $330,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetM-ARK PROJECT INC: $62,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN & WALLKILL: $50,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetCATSKILL REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS INN COLLECTIVE: $15,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetISHA FOUNDATION INC: $14,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $14,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $10,800 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBelleayre Conservatory Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $5,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL SPORTS & CULTURAL EXCHANGE INC: $2,950 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMARY'S PLACE BY THE SEA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEN PORAT YOSEF INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATSKILL RECREATION CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIntegral Yoga Institute Of Nj: $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Onyx and Breezy Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds M-ARK PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN & WALLKILL ↗
  • Who funds CATSKILL REVITALIZATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS INN COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds ISHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Belleayre Conservatory Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
  • Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL SPORTS & CULTURAL EXCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S PLACE BY THE SEA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

A Lindsay & Olive B O'Connor Foundation IncNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: A Lindsay & Olive B O'Connor Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Fjc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pasternak Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pasternak Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pasternak Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph