Skip to content

· Public charity

Pasco L Schiavo Memorial Charitable Fund

The pasco l.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$124kYouth Development$115kEducation$115kHealth$100kArts & Culture$86kFood & Nutrition$40kEnvironment$33kEmployment$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $698,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,029,110 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $330,860 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $560k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLONE CHARITIES$100,000
GREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA$100,000
PENN STATE HAZLETON$100,000
FREELAND YMCA$99,945
VYTAL PLANT SCIENCE RESEARCH$60,000
HAZLETON ART LEAGUE INC$50,000
HAZLETON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$50,000
MEALS ON WHEELS GREATER HAZLETON INC$30,000
NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL RESOURCE CENTER INC (NEPIRC)$20,000
BRANDON'S FOREVER HOME FUND$17,310
WEATHERLY AREA COMMUNITY LIBRARY$15,000
SPOOKY LOU S KITTY RESCUE INC$10,000
MOUNTAINTOP CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$10,000
MAUCH CHUNK HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
WVIA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF CARBON COUNTY: $10k → 10%BRANDON'S FOREVER HOME: $20k → 15%BRANDON'S FOREVER HOME FUND: $17k → 15%GREATER HAZLETON SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INC: $14k → 15%ALLONE CHARITIES: $100k → 15%UNITED CHARITIES INC OF HAZLETON: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$885k · 10 repeat orgs$382k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$885k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

80%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $256k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterScience & TechEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GW
    GREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +11%
  • FY
    FREELAND YMCA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $175k · revenue +155%
  • HA
    HAZLETON ART LEAGUE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PT
    PENNSYLVANIA THEATRE OF PERFORMING
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -43%
  • WA
    WEATHERLY AREA MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • GH
    GREATER HAZLETON SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
2
Zelienople Historical Society

Provides a repository of significant items relating to the history of zelienople pa and makes such items available to the public.

Arts & Culture
3
Greater Hazleton Historical Society

Dedicated to storing, classifying, preserving, and exhibiting artifacts and memorabila of the greater hazleton area.

—
4
Wyoming County Historical Society

To make historical information about wyoming county, pa available to the public

—
5
Friends of Lackawanna

Friends of lackawanna is a pennsylvania non-profit corporation dedicated to supporting the health and welfare of the residents of northeastern pennsylvania and educating individuals regarding the health and safety of the enviroment.

Environment
6
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
7
Ligonier Valley Chamber of Commerce

Promote civic, commercial, recreational, historical, environmental and general interest in the ligonier valley of westmoreland county pennsylvania

—
8
North Penn Volunteer Fire Company

To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.

—
9
Laurel Valley Senior Citizens Center

Operation of three senior citizens centers with approximately 450 seniors citizens thru the Westmoreland County Area Agency on Aging.

—
10
The Helping Hands Society of Hazleton Area Schuylkill and Carbon County Inc

--to provide training and therapy services for disabled children and adults in luzerne, schuylkill, and carbon counties in pennsylvania.

Human Services
11
Pennsylvania Highway Information Association

Pennsylvania highway information association was established to gather and disseminate information to educate the public on the importance and value of the modern and safe highway system to provide for the economic growth of the…

—
12
Schuylkill Chamber of Commerce

To promote commercial, industrial, and civil interest in schuylkill county, pa.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Hazleton Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hazleton Art League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA: $200,000 · OtherGREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCAPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYFREELAND YMCA: $174,945 · OtherFREELAND YMCAMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER HAZLETON INC: $60,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER HAZLETON INCHAZLETON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $50,000 · OtherHAZLETON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTMAUCH CHUNK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $35,000 · OtherWEATHERLY AREA COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $30,000 · Other+11 more: $102,995 · Other+11 moreALLONE CHARITIES: $100,000 · Human ServicesALLONE CHARIT…BRANDONS FOREVER HOME: $37,310 · Human ServicesBRANDONS FORE…GREATER HAZLETON SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INC: $13,600 · Human ServicesGREATER HAZLE…UNITED CHARITIES OF HAZLETON INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED CHARIT…FAMILY PROMISE OF CARBON COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMIS…THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $124,000 · EducationTHE LUZERN…HAZLETON ART LEAGUE: $65,000 · Arts & CulturePENNSYLVANIA THEATRE OF PERFORMING: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureVYTAL PLANT SCIENCE RESEARCH: $60,000 · Science & TechNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL RES RESOURCE CENTER INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER HAZLETON AREA CIVIC PARTNERSHIP: $32,500 · Environment
Other$852,940Human Services$170,910Education$124,000Arts & Culture$100,000Science & Tech$60,000Community Improvement$50,000Environment$32,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA: $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFREELAND YMCA: $174,945 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $124,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALLONE CHARITIES: $100,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHAZLETON ART LEAGUE: $65,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER HAZLETON INC: $60,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL RES RESOURCE CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBRANDONS FOREVER HOME: $37,310 over 2y, 36% of budgetMAUCH CHUNK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $35,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetGREATER HAZLETON AREA CIVIC PARTNERSHIP: $32,500 over 2y, 68% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA THEATRE OF PERFORMING: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetGREATER HAZLETON SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INC: $13,600 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetUNITED CHARITIES OF HAZLETON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST HAZLETON FIRE HOSE HOOK & LADDER CO-1: $10,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetCHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF CARBON COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER HAZLETON INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Luzerne FoundationPA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Luzerne Foundation · Ppl Foundation · First Federal Charitable Foundation · Allone Foundation · Allone Charities · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Blackhorse Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pasco L Schiavo Memorial Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pasco L Schiavo Memorial Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pasco L Schiavo Memorial Charitable Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Pasco L Schiavo Memorial Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pasco L Schiavo Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph