Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Partnersfinancial Charitable Foundation

To award grants to nonprofit organizations that improve our members' local communities.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$106kHuman Services$62kInternational$25kYouth Development$20kHousing & Shelter$12kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $37,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $102,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF HOPE$25,000
CHILDHELP INC$6,000
FIRST PLACE AZ$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDHELP INC: $25k → 11%HEROES HELPING HEROES: $5k → 11%CHILDHELP INC: $6k → 11%FINSECA FUND: $10k → 14%CHILDHELP INC: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MN
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Partnersfinancial Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Partnersfinancial Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$115k · 7 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +134% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$115k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+57%

Still filing today

86%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CHILDHELP INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $37k · revenue +5%
  • FP
    FIRST PLACE AZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +8%
  • NB
    No Books No Ball Basketball Program a Non-Profit Corporation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +198% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -40%
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +26%
  • FF
    FINSECA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +110%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

3
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
6
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

7
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

8
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

9
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
10
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

11
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az and the most unlike its peers is St Joseph Combined Fund 47F045018. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE — $25,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPENATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $25,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHTexas Neurofibromatosis Foundation — $10,000 · HealthTexas Neurofibromatosis Founda…ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA …CHILDHELP INC — $37,000 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INCFINSECA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesFINSECA FOUNDATIONHEROES HELPING HEROES HEROES HELPING HEROES — $5,000 · Human ServicesHEROES HELPING HEROES HE…Both Hands Foundation — $5,000 · Human ServicesBoth Hands FoundationLIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION — $26,000 · OtherLIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FO…DIVFAM FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherDIVFAM FOUNDATIONST JOSEPH COMBINED FUND 47F045018 — $5,000 · OtherST JOSEPH COMBINED FUND 47F0…LIONS WORLD VISION INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · OtherLIONS WORLD VISION INSTITUTE…BEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC — $5,000 · OtherBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INCHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $9,262 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $6,000 · OtherSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETYWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $25,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…No Books No Ball Basketball Program a Non-Profit Corporation — $10,000 · EducationWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC — $5,000 · EducationFIRST PLACE AZ — $12,000 · Housing & ShelterUrbanPromise Charlotte — $10,000 · Youth Development
Health$70,000Human Services$57,000Other$66,262International$25,000Education$20,000Housing & Shelter$12,000Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDHELP INC — $37,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION — $26,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST PLACE AZ — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNo Books No Ball Basketball Program a Non-Profit Corporation — $10,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetFINSECA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUrbanPromise Charlotte — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $9,262 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIONS WORLD VISION INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES HELPING HEROES HEROES HELPING HEROES — $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBoth Hands Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Partnersfinancial Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Academy Prep Center of Tampa Inc3% of income from government
  • Lions World Vision Institute Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph