Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Partners for Home Inc

To coordinate a comprehensive response system to ending homelessness in the city of atlanta.

$20M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Housing & Shelter$47MHealth$3.7MHuman Services$994kCrime & Legal$912kEnvironment$380kReligion$327kPhilanthropy$285kPublic Safety & Disaster$188kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 21 grants below total $16,677,404 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $20,056,889 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,379,485 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $790k
  • $250k+13 grants · $16M
$371,132
Median grant
1
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION INC$6,256,773
SAFEHOUSE OUTREACH$1,567,720
GATEWAY CENTER$1,537,716
HOPE ATLANTA$1,516,509
ANIZ INC$1,304,679
NICHOLAS HOUSE$872,875
THE SALVATION ARMY - RED SHIELD SERVICES$518,890
TI ASSET MANAGEMENT INC$470,169
OPEN DOORS SOLUTIONS INC$430,157
ZABAN PARADIES CENTER$373,581
OUR HOUSE INC$371,132
FRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC$326,717
MERCY CARE$283,262
INTOWN CARES$213,190
STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC$200,840
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $27.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $201k → 14%INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES: $409k → 13%OPEN DOORS SOLUTIONS INC: $1.2M → 14%INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES: $335k → 13%OPEN DOORS SOLUTIONS INC: $1.0M → 14%INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES: $259k → 13%OPEN DOORS SOLUTIONS INC: $878k → 14%INTOWN CARES: $213k → 13%OPEN DOORS SOLUTIONS INC: $430k → 14%THE ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $11k → 13%OPEN DOORS SOLUTIONS INC: $61k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $127k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $104k → 14%YOUTH EMPOWERMENT SUCCESS SERVICES: $13k → 13%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $9.7M → 13%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION INC: $6.3M → 13%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $2.4M → 13%CHRIS 180: $42k → 14%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $2.1M → 13%CHRIS 180: $39k → 14%CHRIS180: $16k → 14%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $609k → 13%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $465k → 13%PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $463k → 13%QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $27k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52M · 21 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
7

Total granted

$52M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+28%

Still filing today

86%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $633k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterReligionPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $22M · revenue +297% · 60% of their budget
  • 2G
    247 GATEWAY LLC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.4M · revenue +97% · 30% of their budget
  • OD
    Open Doors Solutions Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +130% · 56% of their budget

Funded once

  • RE
    River Edge BHC
    one grant, 2024 · $380k
  • AV
    ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN
    one grant, 2022 · $294k · revenue -22%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $285k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CaringWorks Inc

Caringworks' mission is to reduce homelessness and empower the marginalized by providing access to housing and services that foster dignity, self-sufficieny & well-being.

Human Services
2
Empowering Men and Women on the Move for Re-Entry Inc

Empowering Men and Women On the Move for Re-entry Inc, Supportive Housing Program for who are Homeless in Metro Atlanta. Mission Improve Quality of Life.

Crime & Legal
3
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
4
Gateway House Inc

Through crisis intervention, comprehensive support services and community collaboration, gateway domestic violence center helps create an environment for safe, healthy, self-sufficient growth, and violence prevention.

Human Services
5
Partners for Home Inc

To coordinate a comprehensive response system to ending homelessness in the city of atlanta.

Housing & Shelter
6
Houses of Light Llc

Providing transitional and permanent supportive housing, along with homelessness prevention policies, to individuals who are experiencing or at immediate risk of experiencing homelessness (including veterans and hospital to home from grady…

—
7
Life House Atlanta Inc
Human Services
8
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
9
SupportWorks Housing

We end homelessness by providing permanent housing and supportive services.

—
10
Inner City Night Shelter Inc

A non-profit corporation that provides shelter for homeless men and women in savannah, georgia.

Housing & Shelter
11
Victory Programs Inc

We open the door to hope, recovery, and community for individuals and families facing homelessness, addiction or other chronic health conditions.

Health
12
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Frontline Response International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number31%0%<5yr18%8%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr8%24%35–55yr8%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value31%0%<5yr18%9%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr15%64%20–35yr8%7%35–55yr8%11%55yr+

The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
22%
3,487/16,031

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC — $22,007,365 · Human ServicesPROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INCOpen Doors Solutions Inc — $3,595,421 · Human ServicesOpen Doors Solutions IncINTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES INC — $1,216,533 · Human Services+5 more — $579,010 · Human Services247 GATEWAY LLC — $8,404,517 · Other247 GATEWAY LLCHOPE ATLANTA INC — $2,392,150 · OtherHOPE ATLANTA INCSAINT JOSEPH'S MERCY CARE SERVICES INC — $1,892,323 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH'S MERCY CARE SERVICES…TI ASSET MANAGEMENT INC — $697,253 · OtherOUR HOUSE INC — $669,784 · OtherPARTNERSHIP AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC — $617,930 · Other+7 more — $1,728,014 · Other+7 moreANIZ INC — $2,964,423 · HealthANIZ INCBEHAVIORAL HEALTH OF GEORGIA INC — $1,425,801 · HealthBEHAVIORA…+3 more — $96,548 · HealthZABAN PARADIES CENTER FOR HOMELESS COUPLES INC — $1,850,986 · Housing & ShelterNicholas House Inc — $970,298 · Housing & ShelterSAFEHOUSE OUTREACH INC — $1,745,232 · ReligionFRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $641,164 · ReligionUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $285,000 · PhilanthropyFirst Step Staffing Inc — $57,957 · Employment
Human Services$27,398,329Other$16,401,971Health$4,486,772Housing & Shelter$2,821,284Religion$2,386,396Philanthropy$285,000Employment$57,957

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROJECT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC — $22,007,365 over 7y, 60% of budget247 GATEWAY LLC — $8,404,517 over 9y, 30% of budgetOpen Doors Solutions Inc — $3,595,421 over 5y, 56% of budgetANIZ INC — $2,964,423 over 5y, 33% of budgetHOPE ATLANTA INC — $2,392,150 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S MERCY CARE SERVICES INC — $1,892,323 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetZABAN PARADIES CENTER FOR HOMELESS COUPLES INC — $1,850,986 over 5y, 57% of budgetSAFEHOUSE OUTREACH INC — $1,745,232 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetBEHAVIORAL HEALTH OF GEORGIA INC — $1,425,801 over 5y, 83% of budgetINTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES INC — $1,216,533 over 4y, 16% of budgetNicholas House Inc — $970,298 over 2y, 25% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC — $669,784 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetFRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $641,164 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetPARTNERSHIP AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC — $617,930 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC — $432,490 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN — $293,690 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $285,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHRIS 180 INC — $96,796 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA HARM REDUCTION COALITION INC — $69,471 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFirst Step Staffing Inc — $57,957 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC — $26,666 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $17,114 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH EMPOWERMENT SUCCESS SERVICES — $12,558 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC — $12,073 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FRIENDSHIP INC — $9,963 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…The Community Foundat…The Waterfall Foundat…Atl Fdn-W Peters MainTr Uw Charles I BrananThe Imlay Foundation …THDF II Inc DBA The H…William Josef Foundat…John & Polly Sparks F…Second Helpings Atlan…Tuw Thomas H PittsCommunity Foundation …
United Way of Greater Atlanta IncGA39.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Imlay Foundation Inc · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · William Josef Foundation Inc · John & Polly Sparks Foundation · Second Helpings Atlanta Inc · Tuw Thomas H Pitts · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Partners for Home Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines