Skip to content
Parkhill Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Parkhill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$324k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$137kFood & Nutrition$132kHousing & Shelter$70kHealth$67kEducation$49kPhilanthropy$35kYouth Development$29kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $232k
$6,271
Median grant
3
States reached
$696k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF THE SW$34,000
CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND$28,000
GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL$25,000
LUBBOCK IMPACT$21,118
FOOD BANK OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS$16,700
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$15,000
NORTH AUSTIN FOUNDATION$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LUBBOCK$14,000
HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK$13,400
AMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
TENACIOUSLY TEAL$10,000
CASA OF EL PASO$10,000
SISU YOUTH SERVICES$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FT WORTH$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$7,790
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STOREHOUSE WEST: $1k → 10%SISU YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 16%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 5%STOREHOUSE WEST: $1k → 10%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 5%FOUND MISSION: $3k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $21k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$293k · 19 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$293k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+52%

Still filing today

68%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $191k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +2%
  • COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +2%
  • SW
    STOREHOUSE WEST INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • SA
    SHARP ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue 0%
  • RL
    Red Line Parkway Initiativegraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Texas Food Bank

To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…

Community Improvement
2
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
3
Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc

Food distribution to the hungry throughout an eight county service territory in Southeast Texas.

Human Services
4
Hays County Food Bank

To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

—
5
Coastal Bend Food Bank

To collect and warehouse food which has been donated by concerned businesses and organizations and distribute it to social agencies which feed the needy

Food & Nutrition
6
Concho Valley Regional Food Bank

To serve as a clerainghouse for salvage and surplus food that otherwise might be wasted.

—
7
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
8
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
9
Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry

The mission of the Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry and Support Center is to serve Bastrop County residents going through periods of transition by providing emergency food assistance, education and support.

—
10
San Antonio Food Bank

The mission of the san antonio food bank is to fight hunger in southwest texas through food distribution, programs, education and advocacy.

—
11
Feeding America Texas

Feeding America Texas operates exclusively for charitable purposes by supporting food assistance, hunger relief, and community aid initiatives for individuals and families experiencing food insecurity throughout Texas. The organization…

Food & Nutrition
12
Family Promise of Lubbock Inc

To provide homeless families with children the tools necessary to achieve long term financial, parental, and personal self-sufficiency through a comprehensive program of temporary housing, case management, and supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Texas Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
10/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LUBBOCK: $49,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LUBBOCKRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF THE SW: $34,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF THE SWCASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND: $28,000 · OtherCASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLANDHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $26,300 · OtherHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANKGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL: $25,000 · OtherGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCILSHARP ACADEMY: $20,000 · OtherSHARP ACADEMYBYRON MARTIN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY: $13,082 · Other+24 more: $143,128 · Other+24 moreFood Bank of West Central Texas: $41,814 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Wes…SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLAINS FOO…EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $9,400 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS FIGHT…Central Texas Food Bank Inc: $3,400 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $2,000 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK IMPACT INC: $36,118 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK IMPA…FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $13,600 · Human ServicesFRISCO FAMIL…SISU YOUTH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSISU YOUTH I…NEW LEGACY HOME FOR WOMEN: $3,840 · Human ServicesNEW LEGACY H…Found Mission: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATED: $20,000 · HealthTENACIOUSL…North Austin Foundation: $15,000 · HealthNorth Aust…COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC: $13,252 · HealthCOMMUNITY …WI Cook Foundation Inc: $6,076 · HealthWI Cook Fo…MISSION NORMAN INC: $11,400 · Housing & ShelterAMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6,368 · PhilanthropyCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyRed Line Parkway Initiative: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$338,510Food & Nutrition$86,614Human Services$68,058Health$54,328Housing & Shelter$21,400Philanthropy$19,368Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $41,814 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLUBBOCK IMPACT INC: $36,118 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $26,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetNorth Austin Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetFRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $13,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC: $13,252 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION NORMAN INC: $11,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRed Line Parkway Initiative: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF EL PASO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $9,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $9,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $6,850 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6,368 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc: $6,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $3,815 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $3,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFound Mission: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTOREHOUSE WEST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Texas Instruments Fou…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Textron Charitable Tr…HDS FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…Mary L Livermore Foun…South Plains Foundati…Helen Jones Foundatio…Garrison Family Found…Xcel Energy FoundationThe Moody Foundation
Community Foundation of West TexasTX28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Texas Instruments Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · HDS Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Garrison Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Moody Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parkhill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parkhill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Parkhill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Parkhill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parkhill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home