· Private foundation
Parkhill Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $232k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF THE SW | $34,000 |
| CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND | $28,000 |
| GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL | $25,000 |
| LUBBOCK IMPACT | $21,118 |
| FOOD BANK OF WEST CENTRAL TEXAS | $16,700 |
| SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| NORTH AUSTIN FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LUBBOCK | $14,000 |
| HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK | $13,400 |
| CASA OF EL PASO | $10,000 |
| AMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $10,000 |
| TENACIOUSLY TEAL | $10,000 |
| SISU YOUTH SERVICES | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FT WORTH | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $7,790 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $191k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +2%
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +2%- SWSTOREHOUSE WEST INC2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- SASHARP ACADEMYone grant, 2024 · $20k
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INCone grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue 0%
- RLRed Line Parkway Initiativeone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
Food distribution to the hungry throughout an eight county service territory in Southeast Texas.
To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.
To collect and warehouse food which has been donated by concerned businesses and organizations and distribute it to social agencies which feed the needy
To serve as a clerainghouse for salvage and surplus food that otherwise might be wasted.
To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.
The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.
The mission of the Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry and Support Center is to serve Bastrop County residents going through periods of transition by providing emergency food assistance, education and support.
The mission of the san antonio food bank is to fight hunger in southwest texas through food distribution, programs, education and advocacy.
Feeding America Texas operates exclusively for charitable purposes by supporting food assistance, hunger relief, and community aid initiatives for individuals and families experiencing food insecurity throughout Texas. The organization…
To provide homeless families with children the tools necessary to achieve long term financial, parental, and personal self-sufficiency through a comprehensive program of temporary housing, case management, and supportive services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Texas Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Covenant Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Food Bank of West Central Texas ↗
- Who funds LUBBOCK IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds North Austin Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION NORMAN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Red Line Parkway Initiative ↗
- Who funds CASA OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds AMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds SISU YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
- Who funds LAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WI Cook Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Texas Instruments Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · HDS Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Garrison Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Moody Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Parkhill Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Parkhill Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Parkhill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.