Skip to content

· Private foundation

Parkening Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$18kEducation$2kHealth$2kInternational$2kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,500
Calvary Community Church$500
Joni and Friends$500
Ohana Health$300
Open Arms Pregnancy Clinic$300
Samaritan's Purse$300
International Fellowship of Christi$300
Community Pregnancy Clinic$300
Individual grant recipient$200
Union Rescue Mission$200
Wycliffe Bible Translators$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Union Rescue Mission: $200 → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
AZ
TN
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$24k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+81%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JONI AND FRIENDS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +82%
  • TM
    The Master's University and Seminary
    4× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +41%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2017–2024 · $1k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • SC
    South Creek Church
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200 · revenue +59%
  • SG
    SLAVIC GOSPEL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
2
Divine Romance Ministries

Divine Romance Ministries Inc provides Christ-centered mentoringcoaching Our goal is to strengthen christian marriages in an effort to eliminate divorce The focus of our message is a complete and total submission to the Lord Jesus Christ 1…

Religion
3
Open Arms Ministry
Human Services
4
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
5
Oasis Pregnancy Care Centers Corp

Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…

Human Services
6
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
7
Redeemed Christian Church of God

To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.

Religion
8
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
9
Gospel Care Collective

Provide resources for global orphan care

Human Services
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
12
Divine Revelation Ministry
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Arms Pregnancy Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Open Arms Pregnancy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $9,749 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCHJONI AND FRIENDS: $2,700 · OtherJONI AND FRIENDSGlobal Recordings Network: $1,300 · OtherGlobal Recordings NetworkWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $1,100 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCOpen Arms Pregnancy Center Inc: $900 · Other+9 more: $2,500 · Other+9 moreGrace Ministries International Inc: $2,250 · ReligionGrace Ministries…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,450 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURS…+1 more: $50 · ReligionThe Master's University and Seminary: $2,150 · EducationThe Maste…Orange County Rescue Mission Inc: $1,050 · Housing & ShelterReal Options Womens Clinic: $300 · HealthOPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $300 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 · HealthUNION RESCUE MISSION: $300 · Human Services
Other$18,249Religion$3,750Education$2,150Housing & Shelter$1,050Health$800Human Services$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Ministries International Inc: $2,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Master's University and Seminary: $2,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Arms Pregnancy Center Inc: $900 over 3y, 26% of budgetReal Options Womens Clinic: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOSPEL RECORDINGS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds Grace Ministries International Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Master's University and Seminary ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds Open Arms Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Real Options Womens Clinic ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL RECORDINGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parkening Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parkening Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parkening’s filings →

    More from the funding graph