· Private foundation
Parag and Dulari Doshi Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $4k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JAIN SOCIETY OF METRO CHICAGO | $23,023 |
| PEACE OF MIND YOGIC CENTER | $14,500 |
| GRAM SEVA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MANAV SADHNA | $10,000 |
| JAIN SOCIETY OF OREGON | $2,001 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| PURPLE PAINT | $600 |
| MAHAVIR SENIOR CENTER | $501 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Chicago2× · 2022–2023 · $54k · revenue +22%- AGAPNA GHAR INC2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +194%
- AFAsha for Education2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- UOUNIV OF CHICAGO DIVINITY SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $27k
- JAJAIN ASSOC OF NORTH AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $10k
- ABALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEMgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…
The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.
Maharat for development works to engage and inspire individuals by monitoring the freedom of expression and providing evidence-based news and information through creating and continuously updating a database of freedom of expression…
Transparency is key: we believe spent contributions should be accounted for in this non-profit and thats exactly why we pledge to share our financials for every effort. you, our loyal patrons, will have transparency into how our funds are…
The aga khan foundation u.s.a. is a public, non-denominational, philanthropic organization established by his highness the aga khan. it seeks to promote social development, primarily in low income countries of asia & africa by funding…
Provide financial assistance to orphanages,old-age homes, provide educational scholarships to orphans, arrange health camps and food drives for orphanages and old-age homes.
Association for India's Development is a volunteer movement promoting sustainable, equitable and just development. AID supports grassroots organizations in India and initiates efforts in various interconnected spheres such as education,…
Facilitating international charitable donations to support urgent and high-impact needs in India, including healthcare, education, livelihoods, and social welfare, by enabling U.S. donors to give to vetted causes through Milaap.org.
Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…
To support educational opportunities for underserved children in india, and raising support for and awareness of such activities in the united states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is The Way to My Heart Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds GRAM SEVA FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds ALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds MANAV SADHNA ↗
- Who funds THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SOLIDARITY INC ↗
- Who funds APNA GHAR INC ↗
- Who funds Asha for Education ↗
- Who funds VEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF INDIAN ASSOCIATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds EMBRACE RELIEF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEOPOLITAN LIGHTHOUSE ↗
- Who funds TURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE WAY TO MY HEART INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds EVIDENCE ACTION ↗
- Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Parag and Dulari Doshi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.