Skip to content

· Public charity

Palos Verdes Resale

We are an all volunteer organization that collects and re-sells donated items to generate funds for distribution to local non-profit organizations that are engaged in a variety of charitable missions for the benefit and improvement of society.

$504k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$435kHealth$354kFood & Nutrition$337kReligion$259kHousing & Shelter$214kEducation$180k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$31,076
Median grant
1
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAR$68,467
Exceptional Kids Organization$61,143
Casa de Los Angeles$35,824
New Challenge Minisrty$33,299
Momentum Pediatric Therapy$33,023
Meals on Wheels$32,154
NAMI$31,415
Christian Outreach in Action$31,076
Presentation Learning Center$29,494
Saint John Fisher$28,059
Harbor Interfaith Services$26,748
Sisters of Charity of Rolling Hills$25,808
Family Promise$25,255
Harbor Pregnancy Help Center$24,630
Richstone Family Center$17,805
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $457k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Richstone family Center: $11k → 9%Richstone Family Center: $10k → 9%Richstone Family Center: $10k → 9%Richstone Family Center: $6k → 9%Richstone Family Center: $18k → 14%Harbor Pregancy Help Center: $34k → 14%Harbor Pregnancy Help Center: $32k → 14%Harbor Pregnancy Help Center: $13k → 14%STAR: $71k → 14%STAR: $68k → 14%STAR: $58k → 14%STAR: $53k → 14%STAR: $46k → 14%STAR: $26k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 16 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$2.2M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+471%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $323k · revenue +223%
  • CD
    CASA DE LOS ANGELITOS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $145k · revenue +47%
  • IL
    International Life Services Affiliated Group Cente
    4× · 2022–2025 · $124k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • AS
    Agape - St John Fisher
    one grant, 2023 · $32k
  • HP
    Harbor Pregnancy help center
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IL
    International Life Services Central Program Office
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
2
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
3
Sister League of San Diego Inc

Residential home to serve women needing transitional housing for up to 18 months, assisting the, in regaining their independence.

—
4
Little House

Individual drug and alcohol rehabilitation services

Health
5
Mary Health of the Sick Convalescent & Nursing Hospital Incorporated

To provide the highest level of long-term care in Southern California. The Servants of Mary and Ministers to the Sick are dedicated to helping in the personal life transition of the residents and their famiiles in a spirit and expression…

Health
6
Sheltered Living Inc

Sheltered Living Inc supports the efforts of individuals with intellectual disabilities to achieve independence and actively participate in the community.

Human Services
7
Purposely Chosen

Short Term Residential Treatment Program facility

Human Services
8
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
9
Precious Life Shelter Inc

Precious life shelter provide residential and supportive services for homeless pregnant women and their children.

Human Services
10
Residential Services Inc

Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.

Health
11
Los Angeles Pregnancy Services Inc

Operate a counseling and resource center.

Human Services
12
Oakland Catholic Worker

The Organization offers transitional housing to Latin American immigrants. Its ministry is based on the practice of solidarity with the poor and disenfranchised.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Life Services Affiliated Group Cente; the most unlike its peers is Exceptional Kids Parent Teacher Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TORRANCE-LOMITA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $233,007 · OtherTORRANCE-LOMITA MEALS ON WHEELS INCPresentation Learning Center: $189,026 · OtherPresentation Learning CenterPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $159,260 · OtherPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORKST JOHN FISHER CHURCH: $153,150 · OtherST JOHN FISHER CHURCHNEW CHALLENGE MINISTRIES INC: $152,540 · OtherNEW CHALLENGE MINISTRIES INCCASA DE LOS ANGELITOS: $144,991 · OtherCASA DE LOS ANGELITOSSISTERS OF ROLLING HILLS: $127,616 · OtherSISTERS OF ROLLING HILLSSOUTH BAY ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL dba NAMI SOUTH BAY: $115,413 · OtherSOUTH BAY ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL dba NAMI SOUTH BAYChristian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action: $97,879 · OtherChristian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in ActionFamily Promise: $92,604 · OtherFamily Promise+2 more: $52,570 · OtherSOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC: $323,140 · Human ServicesSOCIETY TO AID RETARDED IN…International Life Services Affiliated Group Cente: $124,313 · Human ServicesInternational Life Service…THE RICHSTONE CENTER INC: $75,172 · Human ServicesTHE RICHSTONE CENTER INC+1 more: $13,079 · Human ServicesHARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $122,982 · Housing & ShelterEXCEPTIONAL KIDS PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $81,861 · EducationHouse of Hope Foundation Inc: $14,397 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES: $10,000 · Health
Other$1,518,056Human Services$535,704Housing & Shelter$122,982Education$81,861Health$24,397

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC: $323,140 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTORRANCE-LOMITA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $233,007 over 6y, 25% of budgetPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $159,260 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCASA DE LOS ANGELITOS: $144,991 over 6y, 17% of budgetInternational Life Services Affiliated Group Cente: $124,313 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetHARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $122,982 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH BAY ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL dba NAMI SOUTH BAY: $115,413 over 6y, 53% of budgetChristian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action: $97,879 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL KIDS PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $81,861 over 2y, 36% of budgetTHE RICHSTONE CENTER INC: $75,172 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHouse of Hope Foundation Inc: $14,397 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Life Services Central Program Office: $13,079 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC ↗
  • Who funds TORRANCE-LOMITA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE LOS ANGELITOS ↗
  • Who funds International Life Services Affiliated Group Cente ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BAY ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL dba NAMI SOUTH BAY ↗
  • Who funds Christian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL KIDS PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RICHSTONE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds House of Hope Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Life Services Central Program Office ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Crail-Johnson FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Crail-Johnson Foundation · Vistas for Children Inc · Henry L Guenther Foundation · California Community Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Palos Verdes Resale funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Palos Verdes Resale. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Palos Verdes Resale?

    Find your warmest path to Palos Verdes Resale through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Palos Verdes Resale’s filings →

    More from the funding graph