Skip to content
Page Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Page Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$874kArts & Culture$83kAnimals$79kReligion$22kRecreation & Sports$14kFood & Nutrition$13kEducation$8kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE$39,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$21,000
IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE$14,500
Individual grant recipient$11,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
HIGH COUNTRY NEWS$8,500
IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION$7,500
CONSERVATION VOTERS OF IDAHO$7,000
WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST$6,500
ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS$6,500
AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST$6,000
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$5,000
PROJECT BIG WOOD$5,000
ROCKY MOUNTAINT FRONT RANCHLANDS GP$5,000
CENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WEST$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $23k → 7%IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $8k → 8%TROUT UNLIMITED: $21k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $13k → 14%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $20k → 9%ENVIORNMENTAL VOLUNTEERS: $8k → 8%WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $39k → 7%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $10k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 7%CONSERVATION VOTERS OF IDAHO: $7k → 8%TROUT UNLIMITED: $20k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $13k → 14%ENVIORNMENTAL VOLUNTEERS: $7k → 8%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $9k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $17k → 7%TROUT UNLIMITED: $20k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $11k → 14%ENVIORNMENTAL VOLUNTEERS: $7k → 8%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $9k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15k → 7%TROUT UNLIMITED: $20k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $10k → 14%ENVIORNMENTAL VOLUNTEERS: $7k → 8%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $9k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14k → 7%TROUT UNLIMITED: $20k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $10k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS: $7k → 8%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $9k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $12k → 7%TROUT UNLIMITED: $20k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $9k → 14%ENVIORNMENTAL VOLUNTEERS: $7k → 8%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $9k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 7%TROUT UNLIMITED: $14k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $9k → 14%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $8k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 7%TROUT UNLIMITED: $14k → 11%SALMON RIVER STEWARDSHIP: $9k → 14%HIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $8k → 15%WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST: $8k → 7%WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST: $8k → 7%CENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WEST: $10k → 8%CENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WEST: $10k → 8%CENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WEST: $8k → 8%CENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WEST: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
OR
CA
CO
VA
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 34 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -51% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-51%

Still filing today

62%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $174k · revenue +385%
  • IC
    IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +35%
  • HC
    HIGH COUNTRY NEWS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IR
    IDAHO RANGELAND CONSERVATION PART
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • KC
    KETCHUM COMMUNITY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • FW
    FOUR WINDS WESTWARD HOME
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
2
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Swan Valley Connections

Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.

Environment
5
Big Thompson Watershed Coalition

Vision: a healthy and resilient big thompson watershed benefitting fish, wildlife, and the people itserves through collaborative efforts for current and future generations. mission: working with others to take action that protects and…

Environment
6
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
7
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
8
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
9
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
10
Wild Salmon Rivers

To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…

Environment
11
Trout Unlimited Inc

To conserve, protect, and restore north america's coldwater fisheries and their watersheds.

Animals
12
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lemhi Regional Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is Idaho Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TROUT UNLIMITED: $149,000 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITEDTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $120,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $90,000 · OtherIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INCIndividual grant recipient: $82,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WEST: $55,500 · OtherCENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WESTCONSERVATION VOTERS OF IDAHO: $38,000 · OtherCONSERVATION VOTERS OF IDAHOIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRAILING OF THE SHEEP: $22,000 · Other+11 more: $55,000 · Other+11 moreWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $174,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCEHIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $67,500 · EnvironmentHIGH COUNTRY NEWSWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $48,500 · EnvironmentWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST COPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $39,500 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUSTWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $25,500 · EnvironmentWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCYTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $22,000 · EnvironmentEnvironmental Volunteers Inc: $19,500 · Environment+6 more: $40,900 · Environment+6 moreIdaho Wildlife Federation: $39,500 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $25,000 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife: $3,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $26,000 · Food & NutritionBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $12,550 · Food & NutritionBOLINAS MUSEUM: $19,700 · Arts & CultureWALLOWA RESOURCES INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $9,000 · Recreation & SportsBolinas Community Inc: $450 · Community ImprovementBOLINAS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $400 · Housing & Shelter
Other$648,500Environment$437,400Animals$67,500Food & Nutrition$38,550Arts & Culture$27,200Recreation & Sports$9,000Community Improvement$450Housing & Shelter$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $174,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $120,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $90,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $67,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $48,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $39,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Wildlife Federation: $39,500 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $25,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $22,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOLINAS MUSEUM: $19,700 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetEnvironmental Volunteers Inc: $19,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $12,550 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $8,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWALLOWA RESOURCES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLEMHI REGIONAL LAND TRUST: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT BIG WOOD A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEnvironmental Traveling Companions: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO COALITION OF LAND TRUSTS: $4,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBolinas Community Inc: $450 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOLINAS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Wildlife Federation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BOLINAS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Volunteers Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WALLOWA RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEMHI REGIONAL LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BIG WOOD A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Traveling Companions ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO COALITION OF LAND TRUSTS ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…The San Francisco Fou…Silicon Valley Commun…Jewish Community Fede…Elkind Family Foundat…The Nature ConservancyMorgan Stanley Global…Shell USA Company Fou…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…
Marin Community FoundationCA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Elkind Family Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Page Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Page Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Wallowa Resources Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Western Rivers Conservancy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Page’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home