· Private foundation
Page Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE | $39,000 |
| TROUT UNLIMITED | $21,000 |
| IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE | $14,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| HIGH COUNTRY NEWS | $8,500 |
| IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION | $7,500 |
| CONSERVATION VOTERS OF IDAHO | $7,000 |
| WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST | $6,500 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS | $6,500 |
| AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST | $6,000 |
| PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST | $5,000 |
| PROJECT BIG WOOD | $5,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAINT FRONT RANCHLANDS GP | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WEST | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -51% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WLWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE8× · 2017–2024 · $174k · revenue +385%
- ICIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +35%
- HCHIGH COUNTRY NEWS8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- IRIDAHO RANGELAND CONSERVATION PARTone grant, 2019 · $4k
- FWFOUR WINDS WESTWARD HOMEone grant, 2017 · $1k
- KCKETCHUM COMMUNITY LIBRARYone grant, 2017 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.
Vision: a healthy and resilient big thompson watershed benefitting fish, wildlife, and the people itserves through collaborative efforts for current and future generations. mission: working with others to take action that protects and…
Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.
Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…
Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…
We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)
To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…
To conserve, protect, and restore north america's coldwater fisheries and their watersheds.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lemhi Regional Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Idaho Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
- Who funds Idaho Wildlife Federation ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds BOLINAS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Environmental Volunteers Inc ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
- Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WALLOWA RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds LEMHI REGIONAL LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds PROJECT BIG WOOD A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Environmental Traveling Companions ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COALITION OF LAND TRUSTS ↗
- Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Elkind Family Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Page Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wallowa Resources Inc — 100% of income from government
- Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.