Skip to content

· Public charity

Pace Cares Corp

The organizations mission is to support other charitable organizations that benefit disadvantaged youth.

$258k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$308kReligion$118kHousing & Shelter$88kFood & Nutrition$80kHuman Services$58kHealth$40kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $214,171, the rows itemized in this filing. The $257,771 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $43,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD LUBAVITCH$70,000
PRODUCE MARKETING INC$44,676
SPROUT SOCIETY$35,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAMIR$25,000
Individual grant recipient$14,495
AMERICAN FUNDS OF AISH H$10,000
THE TORCH FOUNDATION$7,500
AUTISM SPEAKS$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOE TORRES SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 6 repeat orgs$448k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
22

Total granted

$381k
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+51%

Still filing today

83%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $207k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $168k · revenue +53%
  • 1P
    14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $130k · revenue -20%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $24k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • JF
    JACKETS FOR THE HOMELESS
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
  • BG
    BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +13%
  • TJ
    THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +164%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Easter Seals New York Inc

We provide services so that people with disabilities can live, learn, & work in our communities.

—
4
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
5
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
6
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
7
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
8
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
9
Northside Center for Child Development Inc

To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…

Education
10
Gateway Counseling Center Inc

Gateway's organizational mission is a dedication to promoting habilitative and mental health services to developmentally disabled and severely and persistently mentally ill population by establishing a safe environment that supports…

—
11
Forestdale Inc

Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.

Human Services
12
New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault Inc

The alliance leads new york citys mission to end sexual violence through education, prevention programming, research, and policy change. until we end sexual violence in all forms, we will be here for all survivors and the organizations…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Nyc; the most unlike its peers is Nontraditional Employment for Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD LUBAVITCH: $70,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCHPRODUCE MARKETING INC: $44,676 · OtherPRODUCE MARKETING INCJACKETS FOR THE HOMELESS: $36,151 · OtherJACKETS FOR THE HOMELESSSPROUT SOCIETY: $35,000 · OtherSPROUT SOCIETYAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAMIR: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAMIRARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK: $22,500 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORKIndividual grant recipient: $14,495 · Other+17 more: $158,200 · Other+17 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $168,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 · International14 PLUS FOUNDATION INCFRIENDS OF ST DOMINIC'S INC: $22,500 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $11,500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $7,500 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,700 · HealthREBUILDING TOGETHER NYC: $23,500 · Housing & ShelterBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesTORCH FOUNDATION: $14,600 · PhilanthropyNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$406,022International$298,000Health$47,200Housing & Shelter$38,500Human Services$15,000Philanthropy$14,600Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $168,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NYC: $23,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST DOMINIC'S INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTORCH FOUNDATION: $14,600 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $11,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING CIRCLE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACDS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds 14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ST DOMINIC'S INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TORCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds ACDS INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pace Cares Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pace Cares Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pace Cares Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Pace Cares Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pace Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph