Skip to content
Pace-Able Private Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Pace-Able Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$148k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$607kEducation$584kHealth$142kCommunity Improvement$51kYouth Development$41kFood & Nutrition$41kAnimals$3kEmployment$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Elimu Fanaka Foundation$50,000
Pastoral Women's Council$50,000
Myriad USA$23,900
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Biosorra$4,000
The Akaa Project$2,500
Silicon Valley Urban Debate League$2,000
All Five$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($1.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($322k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Canine Companions for Independence Inc: $1k → 9%Elimu Fanaka Foundation: $50k → 10%Canine Companions for Independence Inc: $1k → 9%Canine Companions for Independence: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
NC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($322k)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$141k · 6 grants
Tanzania$60k · 2 grants
Kenya$54k · 2 grants
Uganda$24k · 2 grants
Rwanda$23k · 2 grants
Zimbabwe$12k · 1 grant
Mauritius$8k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Pace-Able Private Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 22%.

Pace-Able Private Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 14 repeat orgs$489k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$1.0M
$419k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+90%

Still filing today

57%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EG
    ECHOING GREEN INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $225k · revenue +107%
  • AM
    African Mission Healthcare Foundation
    2× · 2019–2021 · $40k · revenue +26%
  • NH
    NOORA HEALTH
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +273%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RODDENBERRY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $185k · revenue +177%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $56k
  • OS
    Opero Services
    one grant, 2023 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
2
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
3
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
4
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
5
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
6
Keralink International Inc

Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.

Health
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
9
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
10
Trustafrica

Promote peace, democracy and economic prosperity in Africa.

International
11
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
12
Global Greengrants Fund

Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cycle Connect Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Roddenberry Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
10/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pastoral Women's Council: $60,000 · OtherPastoral Women's CouncilIndividual grant recipient: $56,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPromoting Equality in African Schools: $55,409 · OtherPromoting Equality in African …Opero Services: $46,000 · OtherOpero ServicesInspiring Futures: $30,000 · OtherInspiring FuturesBiosorra: $29,000 · OtherBiosorraABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US INC: $29,000 · OtherABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US IN…Shona Capital Limited: $23,713 · OtherShona Capital LimitedIndividual grant recipient: $22,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAfrican Mission Healthcare (fiscal sponsor of Banyatereza Sisters): $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,888 · Other+5 more: $27,700 · Other+5 moreECHOING GREEN INC: $224,941 · EducationECHOING GREEN INCTHE RODDENBERRY FOUNDATION: $185,000 · EducationTHE RODDENBERRY FOUNDATION+2 more: $4,000 · EducationCYCLE CONNECT INC: $205,000 · InternationalCYCLE CONNECT INCROOT CAPITAL INC: $80,000 · InternationalROOT CAPITAL INCSANERGY INC: $40,000 · InternationalSANERGY INCAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation: $40,000 · InternationalAfrican Mission Healthcare Fo…MYRIAD USA INC: $23,900 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC+2 more: $12,500 · InternationalOne World Childrens Fund: $176,600 · PhilanthropyOne World Chi…WATSI INC: $70,000 · HealthNOORA HEALTH: $3,250 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthELIMU FANAKA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $500 · Employment
Other$415,410Education$413,941International$401,400Philanthropy$176,600Health$73,500Human Services$52,500Community Improvement$1,000Employment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECHOING GREEN INC: $224,941 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCYCLE CONNECT INC: $205,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetTHE RODDENBERRY FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetOne World Childrens Fund: $176,600 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetROOT CAPITAL INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWATSI INC: $70,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetELIMU FANAKA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetSANERGY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US INC: $29,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $23,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAC USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOORA HEALTH: $3,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAll Five: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Urban Debate League: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLava Mae: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIC MOBILE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECHOING GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CYCLE CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RODDENBERRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds One World Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WATSI INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIMU FANAKA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANERGY INC ↗
  • Who funds African Mission Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US INC ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NOORA HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds GIRL UP INITIATIVE UGANDA ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds All Five ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Urban Debate League ↗
  • Who funds BLACK FARMER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARDLY GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds Lava Mae ↗
  • Who funds MEDIC MOBILE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Rippleworks IncMulago FoundationThe Skoll FoundationImpactassetsincGs Donor Advised Phil…Segal Family Foundati…Dovetail Impact Found…Skoll FundNational Philanthropi…Marin Community Found…Vanguard Charitable E…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA20.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rippleworks Inc · Mulago Foundation · The Skoll Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Skoll Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Marin Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pace-Able Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pace-Able Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pace-Able Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home