How much does P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn give?

P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn reported 11 grants totaling $296,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (33%), Environment (26%), Health (14%).

Who are P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Maine Farmland Trust ($550k), Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc ($295k), Coastal Mountains Land Trust ($258k).

Does P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 18% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Network for Good, National Philanthropic Trust.

Where is P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn based?

P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn is based in PA.

P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn

P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$297k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$100k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$738kEnvironment$581kHealth$313kArts & Culture$248kInternational$142kHuman Services$70kAnimals$38kCommunity Improvement$29kOther$0

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k5 grants · $24k
$10k–50k4 grants · $123k
$50k–250k2 grants · $150k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.1M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
MAINE FARMLAND TRUST INC	$100,000
COASTAL MOUNTAINS LAND TRUST	$50,000
NO CHILD GOES HUNGRY LLC	$34,000
MERCY SHIPS INTERNATIONAL	$34,000
BROADWAY CARES-EQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC	$30,000
PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE	$25,000
MONUMENTS MEN AND WOMEN FOUNDATION	$7,500
100 WOMEN STRONG OHIO INC	$7,500
SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHAR GOLF OF DALLAS IN	$3,500
DREAM BUILDERS FOUNDATION INC	$3,000
SOUTH WALTON BOYS BASKETBALL	$2,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.0M

$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+47%

Still filing today

57%

73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentFood & NutritionInternationalArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MF
Maine Farmland Trust
7× · 2018–2025 · $550k · revenue +198%
BC
BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +43%
CM
Coastal Mountains Land Trust
8× · 2017–2025 · $258k · revenue +44%

Funded once

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue +139%
TC
TANGLEWOOD CAMP AND LEARNING CENTER
one grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue -82%
HR
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -75%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment

Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment

Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals

Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment

Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment

World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International

The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Wipe Out Kids' Cancer Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/19

Grantees still filing

14/19

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$728,462Food & Nutrition$557,500Environment$535,500Arts & Culture$232,500Crime & Legal$62,500International$62,000Education$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on P Mudge Irr- Mudge Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home