Skip to content

· Public charity

Ozarks Food Harvest Inc

Ozarks food harvest's mission is to transform hunger into hope.

$40M
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$13M
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 42 grants below total $251,798, the rows itemized in this filing. The $40,182,013 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,930,215 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $120k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $132k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASH GROVE FOOD PANTRY$25,000
SENIORAGE - MONETT$20,916
OREGON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY - THAYER$20,770
HELP CENTER$15,000
LAFAYETTE HOUSE$14,630
MOBILE FOOD PANTRY - OACAC DADE GREENFIELD$13,475
CAM-BRANSON$11,941
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH - WEST PLAINS$10,000
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER$9,360
KINGDOM CHURCH MARSHFIELD$8,750
HOPE CENTER OF EL DORADO SPRINGS$8,213
L-LIFE$8,030
CROSSLINES - CARTHAGE$7,695
SENIORAGE - HOUSTON$6,546
EMINENCE PANTRY$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $733k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GENESIS: $44k → 12%AGING BEST - CONWAY SENIOR CENTER: $7k → 15%DIXON AREA CARING CENTER: $10k → 16%SENIORAGE - MONETT: $21k → 17%CNP - SFSP COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINIS: $12k → 18%AAAREGIONX - CARL JUNCTION: $5k → 18%MOBILE FOOD PANTRY - OACAC DADE GRE: $15k → 18%OREGON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY - ALTON: $50k → 21%HICKORY COUNTY CARES: $34k → 21%GENESIS: $20k → 12%EL DORADO SPRINGS SENIOR CENTER: $32k → 16%CNP - SFSP COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINIS: $4k → 18%MOBILE FOOD PANTRY - OACAC DADE GREENFIELD: $13k → 18%DOUGLAS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $6k → 19%OREGON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY - ALTON: $36k → 21%HICKORY COUNTY CARES: $20k → 21%SENIORAGE - MTN GROVE: $6k → 23%GOOD SAMARITAN RESOURCE - WAYNESV: $4k → 12%EL DORADO SPRINGS SENIOR CENTER: $27k → 16%COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINISTRIES BOLIV: $3k → 18%DADE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $13k → 18%OREGON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY - ALTON: $6k → 21%HICKORY COUNTY CARES: $4k → 21%MOUNTAIN GROVE LOVE CENTER: $5k → 23%LEAST OF THESE: $31k → 8%CNP - ABOUT OUR KIDS INC NATHANS: $6k → 15%DADE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $12k → 18%OREGON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY - ALTON: $3k → 21%MOUNTAIN GROVE LOVE CENTER: $4k → 23%LEAST OF THESE: $15k → 8%DADE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $7k → 18%LEAST OF THESE: $6k → 8%OACAC - DADE COUNTY: $4k → 18%CNP - ANN SHORT TURNER COMMUNITY CE: $4k → 23%OACAC - DADE COUNTY: $4k → 18%AGING BEST - CROCKER SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 12%CROSSLINES - JOPLIN: $30k → 18%AGING BEST - CROCKER SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 12%CROSSLINES - JOPLIN: $20k → 18%SENIOR AGE - BRANSON: $4k → 14%CROSSLINES - JOPLIN: $7k → 18%CROSSLINES - JOPLIN: $4k → 18%LEAST OF THESE: $24k → 8%SENIOR AGE - SOUTHSIDE: $3k → 15%FOOTSTEPS: $8k → 15%VICTORY MISSION - HELP & HOPE: $22k → 15%CENTER CITY CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $3k → 15%CENTER CITY CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 96 repeat orgs$276k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

96 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
17

Total granted

$13M
$249k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+30%

Still filing today

52%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Christian Action Ministries
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +62%
  • DI
    DISTRICT III AREA AGENCY ON AGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +11%
  • OA
    OZARK ACTION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • AM
    ACTS MINISTRY INC ACTS MINISTRY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $179k · revenue -25%
  • EP
    EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue -20%
  • DA
    DIXON AREA CARING CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
2
Sherman County Senior Center Inc

To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

—
3
Christs Food Center Inc

Provide emergency food to families experiencing disaster and assist low income seniors, disabled and veterans in monthly food needs

Food & Nutrition
4
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
5
Conway County Care Center

Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals

Human Services
6
Helping Hands of Central Missouri

Helping hands of central missouri was formed to construct and operate a food pantry in the central missouri area. the operations of the pantry are supported by a thrift store. all operations are run by volunteer help. no wages paid.

Food & Nutrition
7
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
8
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
9
Turning Point Community Services Center Inc

Provide food for those in need living in the clatskanie oregon area.

Community Improvement
10
Hope Ministries-St Charles County Inc

Overseen and supported by about nine churches in the St. Charles County Mo area. HOPE Food Pantry provides for the needy in and around our community. We distribute groceries weekly to anyone in need. We also help provide items such as baby…

Religion
11
Community Needs of Chillicothe Illinois Inc

Provide temporary assistance to needy individuals. Primary assistance with rent, utilities and food.

—
12
South County Community Food Bank

Providing nutritious food to low income families and individuals in south clatsop county

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Violence Center; the most unlike its peers is Healthy Nevada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
106/109
Grantees still filing
79/109
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OZARKS FOOD HARVEST FOUNDATION: $9,500,000 · Food & NutritionOZARKS FOOD HARVEST FOUNDATION+9 more: $212,205 · Food & NutritionCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKS INC: $235,119 · OtherCOUNCIL OF CHURCHE…Christian Action Ministries: $139,864 · OtherChristian Action M…Lamar Area Christian Ministries Association: $99,194 · OtherST CLAIR COUNTY FOOD BANK: $90,994 · OtherEL DORADO SPRINGS MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION: $82,604 · OtherThe Salvation Army: $82,243 · OtherOREGON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $79,681 · OtherASH GROVE FOOD PANTRY: $79,617 · OtherSOUTHERN STONE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $78,782 · OtherFEED: $71,615 · Other+65 more: $1,086,685 · Other+65 moreDISTRICT III AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $106,457 · Human ServicesOZARK ACTION INC: $102,059 · Human ServicesLEAST OF THESE INC: $82,004 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN OF THE OZARKS: $77,929 · Human ServicesHICKORY COUNTY CARES: $62,038 · Human ServicesCROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA: $61,370 · Human ServicesSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $59,329 · Human ServicesOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $44,720 · Human ServicesDADE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $32,000 · Human Services+19 more: $147,144 · Human ServicesACTS MINISTRY INC ACTS MINISTRY INC: $179,059 · Religion+1 more: $2,100 · ReligionL-Life Food Pantry: $62,087 · Community ImprovementSAMARITAN OUTREACH CENTER: $42,105 · Housing & ShelterCHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES OF TABLE ROCK LAKE: $9,651 · Housing & ShelterTHE INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC: $29,360 · Arts & Culture
Food & Nutrition$9,712,205Other$2,126,398Human Services$775,050Religion$181,159Community Improvement$62,087Housing & Shelter$51,756Arts & Culture$29,360

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST FOUNDATION: $9,500,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetChristian Action Ministries: $139,864 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetDISTRICT III AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $106,457 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOZARK ACTION INC: $102,059 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLamar Area Christian Ministries Association: $99,194 over 9y, 21% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $82,004 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN OF THE OZARKS: $77,929 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetL-Life Food Pantry: $62,087 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetHICKORY COUNTY CARES: $62,038 over 9y, 25% of budgetCROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA: $61,370 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $59,329 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSTOCKTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $57,064 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY: $54,485 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetTEXAS COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $45,532 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $44,720 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN OUTREACH CENTER: $42,105 over 9y, 10.0% of budgetSENECA FOOD PANTRY INC: $41,694 over 8y, 42% of budgetHEART OF THE HILLS FOOD HARVEST INC: $39,216 over 9y, 16% of budgetMISSOURIANS UNITED TO COMBAT HUNGER INC: $37,845 over 9y, 16% of budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $32,925 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $32,572 over 9y, 20% of budgetWEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $31,564 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSLINES MINISTRY INC: $31,197 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC: $29,360 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSPRINGFIELD VICTORY MISSION INC: $24,060 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH MINISTRIES OF BOLIVAR MO: $22,575 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetHELPING HANDS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $20,550 over 9y, 21% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE OZARKS: $16,954 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetLEBANON AREA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCROSSLINES OF MCDONALD CO INC: $13,800 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF THE OZARKS: $12,112 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT 360 YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCONWAY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $10,300 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetMANSFIELD AREA COMMUNITY BETTERMENT ORGANIZATION: $10,102 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetDIXON AREA CARING CENTER INC: $9,780 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES OF TABLE ROCK LAKE: $9,651 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCROCKER COMMUNITY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $9,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetGood Samaritan Boys Ranch: $9,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN GROVE LOVE CENTER FOOD PANTRY: $9,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCenter City Christian Outreach Inc: $8,464 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetGold Silver Services of Houston INC: $7,046 over 3y, 16% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $7,028 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONETT COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $7,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetABOUT OUR KIDS INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5,700 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetGLOBAL TRANSFORMATION INTERNATIONAL: $5,700 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACTS MINISTRY INC ACTS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Action Ministries ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT III AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds OZARK ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lamar Area Christian Ministries Association ↗
  • Who funds LEAST OF THESE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds L-Life Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds HICKORY COUNTY CARES ↗
  • Who funds CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA ↗
  • Who funds SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds STOCKTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN OUTREACH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SENECA FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF THE HILLS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURIANS UNITED TO COMBAT HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO110.1× affinity72 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Arvest Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Hulston Family Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Convoy of Hope · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Seniorage Area Agency on Aging

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ozarks Food Harvest Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ozarks Food Harvest Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ozarks Food Harvest’s filings →

    More from the funding graph