· Public charity
Seniorage Area Agency on Aging
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $1,691,805 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,555,936 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $864,131 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $182k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $382k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Show Me Systems Lifeline | $382,165 |
| Grace Health Services | $220,800 |
| OATS Inc | $116,365 |
| Mountain Grove | $107,000 |
| City of Mountain View | $92,000 |
| Council of Churches of the Ozarks | $89,360 |
| CoxHealth at Home | $74,885 |
| Ava Senior Center | $72,560 |
| Dade County Senior Citizens | $72,549 |
| Integrity Home Care | $69,337 |
| Legal Services of Southern Missouri | $65,255 |
| On The Go | $61,302 |
| Forsyth Senior Center | $60,200 |
| Willow Springs Senior Center | $46,500 |
| SMTS Inc | $39,502 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHARITABLE ADULT RIDES & SERVICES4× · 2022–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +1%
- OIOATS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $785k · revenue +22%
- LSLegal Services of Southern Missouri6× · 2020–2025 · $311k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- COCity of Mountain Viewone grant, 2022 · $79k
- 4H417 Home Care LLCone grant, 2020 · $20k
- CMCitizens Memorial Health Care Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes
Adults day care
Providing services to Seniors
Provides meals and services to senior citizens of the comunity and surrounding towns
Senior center
Meals for elderly
Provide assistance for the elderly, frail and disabled in le sueur county and surrounding counties.
Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
To offer a nutrition program for older persons.
Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens Memorial Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dade County Senior Citizens Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARITABLE ADULT RIDES & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Healthcare Services of the Ozarks Inc ↗
- Who funds OATS INC ↗
- Who funds Legal Services of Southern Missouri ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF MOUNTAN VIEW MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OZARKS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUMMERSVILLE SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds SENIOR FRIENDSHIP SITE ↗
- Who funds FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Citizens Memorial Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds EBENEZER HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Area Agency on Aging Region X · Mfa Oil Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seniorage Area Agency on Aging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.