Skip to content
Oxfam-America Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Oxfam-America Inc

Oxfam america (oxfam or oa) is a global organization that fights inequality to end poverty and injustice.

$21M
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
9
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$2.2MInternational$1.8MHuman Services$988kEmployment$795kEnvironment$672kPublic Benefit$533kHousing & Shelter$436kCommunity Improvement$435kOther$0
02FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $217,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $21,412,281 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,194,981 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$12,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMOCRACY IN ACTION$26,000
TALLGRASS INSTITUTE$25,000
NATIONAL COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION$20,000
FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVESLAND ASSISTANCE FUND$19,800
CAROLINA AMAZONIANS UNITED FOR SOLIDARITY & EMPOWERMENT$15,000
UNITED FOR RESPECT EDUCATION FUND$15,000
PENNSYLVANIA POLICY CENTER$14,000
VOTE TO LIVE FOUNDATION$12,500
MISSISSIPPI JOURNALISM AND EDUCATION GROUP$10,000
DEPENDABLE SOURCE CORP CENTER FOR COMMUNITY & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT$10,000
NEW ALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$10,000
FORWARD JUSTICE$10,000
COLLECTIVE EDUCATION FUND$10,000
WORKPLACE JUSTICE PROJECT CO INVEST IN LOUISIANA$10,000
9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $509k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE POWER COALITION: $55k → 17%THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECTS: $30k → 12%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $32k → 8%TRIBAL IMAGES MUSEUM INC: $10k → 17%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $30k → 8%BOAT PEOPLE SOS: $22k → 19%DRESS FOR SUCCESS METRO JACKSON JACKSON MEDICAL MALL: $25k → 23%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 14%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $25k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $90k → 23%THE POWER COALITION: $25k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $45k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $40k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $30k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $25k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
MD
AR
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $21M on the FY2026 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$7.4M · 35% · 36 grants

Stated purpose: ECONOMIC AND RACIAL JUSTICE · EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES · CLIMATE JUSTICE

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$6.6M · 31% · 31 grants

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN · NATURAL RESOURCE JUSTICE · ECONOMIC AND RACIAL JUSTICE

Central America and the Caribbean$2.9M · 14% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP · PRIVATE SECTOR · GENDER JUSTICE AND INCLUSION HUB

Middle East and North Africa$2.4M · 11% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: GENDER JUSTICE AND INCLUSION HUB · GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP · HUMANITARIAN

South America$1.0M · 5% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP · NATURAL RESOURCE JUSTICE · STRATEGY & INSIGHTS HUB

South Asia$599k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN

North America (Canada and Mexico)$323k · 2% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: GENDER JUSTICE AND INCLUSION HUB · ECONOMIC AND RACIAL JUSTICE · GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 45 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 38 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
59

Total granted

$6.2M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

82%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesCivil RightsInternationalEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $402k · revenue +8%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RELIEF COALITION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $390k · revenue +125% · 66% of their budget
  • NC
    National Coalition on Black Civic Partic
    5× · 2019–2026 · $328k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SO
    STITCHING OXFAM INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $678k · revenue -11% · 43% of their budget
  • OA
    OXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC
    one grant, 2025 · $262k · revenue -52% · 43% of their budget
  • LW
    LIVING WAGE FOR US INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +39% · 33% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Women's Link Worldwide

A legal organization working to advance the rights of women, girls, and gender diverse people. We work on issues of reproductive rights, gender-based violence, climate, and racial justice in East Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the…

Civil Rights
6
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
7
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
8
Corporate Accountability Lab

The Organization unleashes the creative potential of the law to protect people and the planet from corporate abuse.

International
9
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
10
LexCollective

LexCollective is a not-for-profit organization that addresses the most extreme forms of social, racial, economic, and environmental injustices around the world, such as mass atrocities, human trafficking, environmental destruction, and…

International
11
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
12
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stitching Oxfam International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
93/104
Grantees still filing
54/104
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW WAY MISSISSIPPI INC: $605,000 · Human ServicesNEW WAY MISSISSIPPI INCCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC: $402,000 · Human ServicesCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA M…URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $230,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANAINTER-MUJERES PUERTO RICO CORPORACION: $155,000 · Human ServicesINTER-MUJERES PUERTO RICO …PROYECTO MATRIA INC: $121,856 · Human ServicesPROYECTO MATRIA INCBRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK: $95,000 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $87,000 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ALLIES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesONE VOICE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesCOALICION DE COALICIONES PRO PERSONAS SIN HOGAR DE PUERTO RICO: $70,680 · Human Services+6 more: $132,100 · Human Services+6 moreSTITCHING OXFAM INTERNATIONAL: $678,462 · InternationalSTITCHING OXFAM INTE…AMERICAN RELIEF COALITION: $389,817 · InternationalAMERICAN RELIEF COAL…UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO LAW SCHOOL TRUST: $150,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF PUERTO…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $140,742 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSI…Alianza Americas: $130,100 · InternationalAlianza AmericasSYRIAN COMMUNITY NETWORK: $54,760 · International+3 more: $60,000 · InternationalCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS INC: $135,000 · OtherCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJAD…AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION: $110,000 · OtherNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center: $108,000 · OtherCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $85,000 · OtherLimitless Vistas Inc: $159,500 · OtherLimitless Vistas IncLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherMONGABAY ORG CORP: $112,000 · OtherKARAM FOUNDATION: $85,000 · OtherInterfaith Worker Justice: $105,000 · Other+50 more: $1,401,202 · Other+50 moreEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $300,000 · Civil RightsEARTHRIGHTS …OXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC: $262,253 · Civil RightsOXFAM AMERIC…MISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION: $110,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI …NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK: $75,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY…National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $50,000 · Civil RightsDEMOCRACY IN ACTION: $46,000 · Civil RightsPeoples Institute For Survival and Beyond: $35,000 · Civil RightsFARMWORKER JUSTICE FUND INC: $35,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR ENHANCED EQUITY: $33,750 · Civil Rights+4 more: $62,000 · Civil Rights+4 moreNational Coalition on Black Civic Partic: $328,000 · Public BenefitNational C…FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: $319,040 · Public BenefitFUND FOR C…One Voice: $110,200 · Public BenefitOne VoiceESPACIOS ABIERTOS PUERTO RICO INC: $38,250 · Public Benefit+2 more: $24,000 · Public BenefitDEPENDABLE SOURCE CORP CENTER FOR COMMUNITY & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: $290,600 · Community ImprovementHASER Inc: $100,000 · Community ImprovementNEW ALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $35,000 · Community ImprovementPOWERSWITCH ACTION: $30,000 · Community ImprovementHigher Purpose Hub: $25,000 · Community ImprovementCAPITALPLUS EXCHANGE CORPORATION: $17,700 · Community ImprovementWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER: $180,750 · EmploymentGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER: $150,000 · EmploymentLIVING WAGE FOR US INC: $100,000 · EmploymentFOOD CHAIN WORKERS ALLIANCE: $35,000 · Employment
Human Services$2,058,636International$1,603,881Other$2,380,702Civil Rights$1,009,003Public Benefit$819,490Community Improvement$498,300Employment$465,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTITCHING OXFAM INTERNATIONAL: $678,462 over 1y, 43% of budgetNEW WAY MISSISSIPPI INC: $605,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC: $402,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetAMERICAN RELIEF COALITION: $389,817 over 4y, 66% of budgetNational Coalition on Black Civic Partic: $328,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: $319,040 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $300,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetDEPENDABLE SOURCE CORP CENTER FOR COMMUNITY & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: $290,600 over 6y, 25% of budgetOXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC: $262,253 over 1y, 43% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $230,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER: $180,750 over 5y, 20% of budgetLimitless Vistas Inc: $159,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO LAW SCHOOL TRUST: $150,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER: $150,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $140,742 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS INC: $135,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetAlianza Americas: $130,100 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPROYECTO MATRIA INC: $121,856 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP: $112,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOne Voice: $110,200 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION: $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION: $110,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center: $108,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetInterfaith Worker Justice: $105,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLIVING WAGE FOR US INC: $100,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetHASER Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetBRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK: $95,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $87,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $85,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetKARAM FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetONE VOICE INC: $80,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LABOR SOCIAL AND SPIRITUAL ACTIVISM: $76,557 over 2y, 29% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK: $75,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOALICION DE COALICIONES PRO PERSONAS SIN HOGAR DE PUERTO RICO: $70,680 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetKILOMETRO 0 INC: $62,250 over 2y, 9.8% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetADC RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $55,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetSYRIAN COMMUNITY NETWORK: $54,760 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESILIENT POWER PUERTO RICO INC: $50,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetA BETTER BALANCE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $45,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAYOR'S HEALTHY CITY INITIATIVE: $40,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetESPACIOS ABIERTOS PUERTO RICO INC: $38,250 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetFAMILIES PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF PUERTO RICO: $38,250 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…WK Kellogg FoundationNew Venture FundThe Ford FoundationThe David and Lucile …Foundation for Louisi…NEO Philanthropy IncRockefeller Family Fu…Windward FundWellspring Philanthro…ImpactassetsincRockefeller Philanthr…
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC47.9× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Foundation for Louisiana · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · Windward Fund · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Impactassetsinc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oxfam-America Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oxfam-America Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • National Florence Crittenton Mission: 24% of income from government
  • Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oxfam-America Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oxfam-America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oxfam-America’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home