· Public charity
Our Lady of America Ministries Inc
Our lady of america ministries is a non-profit re-entry organization headquartered in cincinnati, ohio.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF REFUGE DBA ONE WAY FARM | $50,000 |
| ESSENE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST | $17,000 |
| FUTURE AMBASSADORS | $9,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- COCircle of Lovers of the Holy Megillah2× · 2020–2021 · $858k · revenue -89% · 99% of their budget
- ECEssene Church of Christ2× · 2020–2021 · $160k
- ECEssene Church of Christ3× · 2017–2019 · $109k
Funded once
- MHMoeller High Schoolone grant, 2020 · $500k
- SFSTOQ Foundationone grant, 2017 · $50k
- SFStem for Life Foundationone grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide licensed substance use and mental health disorder treatment to those affected by substance and mental health issues.
The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
Bethany house abuse shelter provides a safe haven and comprehensive services for victims of domestic violence and their children.
Our mission is to offer hope and support, enabling children and their mothers to break the cycle of homelessness by empowering them to become part of mainstream society as active, productive citizens through programs and special events…
Provide loving home environment, continuity of care, and empowerment of displaced and fragile children.
Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun
Restore dignity to children and families that have been abused or affected by Dug and alcohol abuse
Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.
Provide and coordinate opportunities for Christ centered ministry by rebuilding hope in peoples lives by seeking to share Christ and build faith for those in crisis and need.
To provide Christian restorative services to families.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Cincinnati Woman's Club · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Our Lady of America Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Our Lady of America Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Our Lady of America Ministries Inc?
Find your warmest path to Our Lady of America Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Our Lady of America Ministries’ filings →