Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Our Lady of America Ministries Inc

Our lady of america ministries is a non-profit re-entry organization headquartered in cincinnati, ohio.

$76k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Religion$1.2MEducation$531kHuman Services$105kPhilanthropy$71kScience & Tech$50kYouth Development$20kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$17,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF REFUGE DBA ONE WAY FARM$50,000
ESSENE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST$17,000
FUTURE AMBASSADORS$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%City of Refuge: $50k → 12%The Help Program: $7k → 16%Northern Ky Childr: $10k → 11%CITY OF REFUGE DBA ONE WAY FARM: $50k → 12%Hope's Closet: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 7 repeat orgs$667k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$1.3M
$650k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+113%

Still filing today

29%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    Circle of Lovers of the Holy Megillah
    2× · 2020–2021 · $858k · revenue -89% · 99% of their budget
  • EC
    Essene Church of Christ
    2× · 2020–2021 · $160k
  • EC
    Essene Church of Christ
    3× · 2017–2019 · $109k

Funded once

  • MH
    Moeller High School
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • SF
    STOQ Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • SF
    Stem for Life Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope Inc

To provide licensed substance use and mental health disorder treatment to those affected by substance and mental health issues.

Health
2
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
3
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
4
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

5
Bethany House Abuse Shelter Inc

Bethany house abuse shelter provides a safe haven and comprehensive services for victims of domestic violence and their children.

Human Services
6
Children's Restoration Network

Our mission is to offer hope and support, enabling children and their mothers to break the cycle of homelessness by empowering them to become part of mainstream society as active, productive citizens through programs and special events…

Human Services
7
Loving Hands Childrens Home

Provide loving home environment, continuity of care, and empowerment of displaced and fragile children.

Housing & Shelter
8
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

9
Childrens Hope Residential Services Inc

Restore dignity to children and families that have been abused or affected by Dug and alcohol abuse

Human Services
10
Children's Center

Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.

11
Rebuilding Hope Inc

Provide and coordinate opportunities for Christ centered ministry by rebuilding hope in peoples lives by seeking to share Christ and build faith for those in crisis and need.

Housing & Shelter
12
Hope House for Our Families Inc

To provide Christian restorative services to families.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethany House Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Circle of Lovers of the Holy Megillah. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Moeller High School — $500,000 · OtherMoeller High SchoolEssene Church of Christ — $160,245 · OtherEssene Church of ChristEssene Church of Christ — $108,600 · OtherEssene Church of ChristSTOQ Foundation — $50,000 · OtherSTOQ FoundationStem for Life Foundation — $50,000 · OtherStem for Life Foundation+7 more — $65,750 · Other+7 moreCircle of Lovers of the Holy Megillah — $858,443 · ReligionCircle of Lovers of the Holy Megillah+1 more — $10,000 · ReligionCITY OF REFUGE — $100,000 · Human ServicesChildren's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesHELP PROGRAM — $6,772 · Human ServicesHOPE'S CLOSET INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesROYALMONT ACADEMY INC — $27,600 · EducationBethany House Services Inc — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$934,595Religion$868,443Human Services$121,772Education$27,600Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCircle of Lovers of the Holy Megillah — $858,443 over 2y, 99% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE — $100,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetROYALMONT ACADEMY INC — $27,600 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBethany House Services Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEY CHAPEL MISSION CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetChildren's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELP PROGRAM — $6,772 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHOPE'S CLOSET INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Circle of Lovers of the Holy Megillah
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE
  • Who funds ROYALMONT ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds Bethany House Services Inc
  • Who funds WESLEY CHAPEL MISSION CENTER
  • Who funds Children's Home of Northern Kentucky Inc
  • Who funds HELP PROGRAM
  • Who funds HOPE'S CLOSET INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Cincinnati Woman's Club · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Our Lady of America Ministries Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2022
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Our Lady of America Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Our Lady of America Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph