Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Children's Trust Fund of Oregon Foundation

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential.

$313k
Granted FY2018
26
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Human Services$420kHealth$70kHousing & Shelter$50kEducation$46kYouth Development$45k
02FY2018 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $296k
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OR ASSOCIATION OF RELIEF NURSERIES$35,000
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE$13,000
SOUTHWESTERN OR COMMUNITY COLLEGE$12,500
MORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$12,500
PEARL BUCK CENTER INC$12,500
SISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$12,500
BUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES$12,500
IMPACT NW$12,500
HACIENDA CDC$12,500
VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$12,500
SELF ENHANCEMENT INC$12,500
PARENTING NOW$12,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF CENT OR$11,500
FAMILIES FIRST PARENT RESOURCE CNTR$11,000
THE NEXT DOOR INC$10,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD & FAMILY DVLPT PRGMS OF CAT: $10k → 11%BUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES: $13k → 12%FAMILIES FIRST PARENT RESOURCE CNTR: $11k → 16%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $8k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY DVLPT PRGMS OF CAT: $10k → 11%BUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES: $13k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $10k → 12%FAMILIES FIRST PARENT RESOURCE CNTR: $11k → 16%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $8k → 18%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $10k → 12%IMPACT NW: $13k → 12%IMPACT NW: $13k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $13k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $13k → 12%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 12%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$631k · 26 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
0

Total granted

$631k
$0

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON ASSOCIATION OF RELIEF NURSERIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $75k · revenue +464%
  • MF
    Metropolitan Family Service
    2× · 2017–2018 · $26k · revenue +97%
  • BH
    BUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +2%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Young Roots Oregon

    The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…

    2
    Parenting With Intent

    Building strong connections for healthy communities through mental health programs, youth empowerment services and family services.

    Human Services
    3
    Trillium Family Services

    Building brighter futures with children and families.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    Mother & Child Education Center

    Mother & child education center (mcem) is a nonprofit in portland, oregon, providing compassionate, judgment-free support to families navigating pregnancy, parenting, and early childhood. mcec builds strong connections in historically…

    5
    First Step Family Support Center

    First step's mission is increasing the well-being of children and families on the north olympic peninsula by collaborating with caregivers and the community to access resources, supports, and skills that build family strengths.

    Human Services
    6
    The Campbell Institute

    Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

    Unclassified
    7
    Malheur County Child Development Center

    Head start & other children services

    Education
    8
    Family and Community Together

    Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…

    Human Services
    9
    A Family for Every Child

    A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…

    Human Services
    10
    Oslc Community Programs dba Oregon Community Programs

    Provide outpatient mental and behavioral therapy for children and families, therapeutic treatment foster care to at-risk youth, as well as a variety of parent training services.

    Science & Tech
    11
    Our Children Oregon

    Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

    Philanthropy
    12
    Brightspark Early Learning Services

    To nurture and sustain child-centered, antiracist early learning communities.Our work is to:1) Help families access high quality childcare and after-school care.2) Increase the availability of high-quality care through coaching and…

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center and the most unlike its peers is South Lane Mental Health Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

    ← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLatino Community Health & S…Community Health CentersYouth Mentoring and SupportYouth Academic SupportSupportive Housing & Servic…Black Community Advocacy Ne…
    the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
    Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

    Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

    Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

    THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr19%48%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr15%14%55yr+
    THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr19%42%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr15%13%55yr+

    The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

    Closures · last 5 years

    The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

    orgs you fund
    4%1/26
    the rest of the field
    12%
    1,713/14,726

    Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

    04the grantee network

    22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    22/22
    Grantees still filing
    21/22
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    OREGON ASSOCIATION OF RELIEF NURSERIES — $75,000 · Human ServicesOREGON ASSOCIATION OF RELIEF NURSERIESMetropolitan Family Service — $26,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family ServiceBUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES — $25,000 · Human ServicesBUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIESIMPACT NW — $25,000 · Human ServicesIMPACT NWFAMILIES FIRST OF GRANT COUNTY INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST OF GRANT COUNTY INCCommunity Action Team — $20,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Action TeamBlack Parent Initiative — $20,000 · Human ServicesBlack Parent InitiativeJANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesJANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INCSTRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES — $15,000 · Human ServicesSTRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIESSOUTHWESTERN OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $25,000 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN OREGON COMMUNITY COL…SISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 · OtherSISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER …SELF ENHANCEMENT INC — $25,000 · OtherSELF ENHANCEMENT INCHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 · OtherHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGON — $23,000 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF CENTRAL…Harney Education Service District — $21,000 · OtherHarney Education Service DistrictSilverton Together Inc — $20,000 · OtherSilverton Together IncLinn-Benton Community College — $20,000 · OtherLinn-Benton Community CollegeVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthVIRGINIA GAR…MORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $25,000 · HealthMORRISON CHI…South Lane Mental Health Services Inc — $20,000 · HealthSouth Lane M…PARENTING NOW — $24,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NEXT DOOR INC — $21,000 · Crime & LegalNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentYACHATS YOUTH & FAMILY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM — $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEARL BUCK CENTER INCORPORATED — $25,000 · EducationOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
    Human Services$248,000Other$184,000Health$70,000Crime & Legal$45,000Youth Development$39,000Education$25,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMetropolitan Family Service — $26,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES — $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEARL BUCK CENTER INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT NW — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Action Team — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBlack Parent Initiative — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Lane Mental Health Services Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYACHATS YOUTH & FAMILY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM — $19,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSTRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES — $15,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Oregon Community FoundationOR46.3× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Collins Foundation · Careoregon Inc · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Reser Family Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Pacificsource Foundation for Health Improvement · Onpoint Community Credit Union

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Children's Trust Fund of Oregon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
    • Oregon Coast Community Action75% of income from government
    • Morrison Child and Family Services74% of income from government
    • Pearl Buck Center Incorporated60% of income from government
    • Families First of Grant County Inc57% of income from government
    • Black Parent Initiative49% of income from government
    • Janus Youth Programs Inc39% of income from government
    • Building Healthy Families39% of income from government
    • The Next Door Inc35% of income from government
    • Strengthening Rural Families35% of income from government
    • Native American Youth and Family Center21% of income from government
    • Metropolitan Family Service21% of income from government
    • Self Enhancement Inc18% of income from government
    • Siskiyou Community Health Center Inc15% of income from government
    • Impact Nw10% of income from government
    • Family Resource Center of Central Oregon5% of income from government
    • South Lane Mental Health Services Inc3% of income from government
    • Parenting Now1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    4rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $41k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph