Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$3.7MHealth$2.1MHousing & Shelter$1.8MFood & Nutrition$475kEducation$349kInternational$300kPublic Benefit$265kArts & Culture$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $500k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$607k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$400,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$250,000
FOOD SHARE INC$200,000
ARTCENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN$100,000
HELP OF OJAI$100,000
DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION$100,000
RADIANT CHURCH$25,000
LIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE$23,650
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
OJAI YOUTH ENTERTAINERS STUDIO$5,000
ZEFFY INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Downtown Womens Center: $260k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $250k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%downtown womens center: $225k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $210k → 14%direct relief foundation: $375k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $200k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $225k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $200k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $225k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $200k → 14%direct relief foundation: $213k → 14%Downtown Womens Center: $200k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%downtown womens center: $10k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
MO
DE
NM
KS
DC
OK
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.9M · 18 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$8.9M
$420k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+6%

Still filing today

72%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DW
    DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +285%
  • OV
    OJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +72%
  • HO
    HELP OF OJAI INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $705k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • AD
    Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Assco
    one grant, 2019 · $235k
  • MH
    MLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -91%
  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
9
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
10
Loma Linda University Medical Center

Our mission is to continue the healing ministry of jesus christ, "to make man whole," in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and…

Health
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ojai Community Farmers Market. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%10%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr13%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%43%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%35%35–55yr13%5%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,954

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION — $3,037,500 · Human ServicesDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATIONDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $1,755,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTERHELP OF OJAI INC — $705,000 · Human ServicesHELP OF OJAI INCOJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN — $1,350,133 · PhilanthropyOJAI VALLEY COMM…+1 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC — $265,000 · EducationART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN — $210,000 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $40,000 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · EducationLIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE — $38,650 · Education+1 more — $20,000 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $500,000 · HealthFOOD SHARE INC — $425,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $25,000 · Food & NutritionOJAI COMMUNITY FARMERS MARKET — $25,000 · Food & NutritionAlzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Assco — $235,000 · OtherRADIANT CHURCH — $45,000 · OtherNational Hispanic Cultural Center Fdtn — $25,000 · OtherOJAI YOUTH ENTERTAINERS STUDIO — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherMLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 · OtherLA WYLD — $50,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM — $35,000 · Other+9 more — $62,500 · OtherHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $300,000 · International
Human Services$5,497,500Philanthropy$1,370,133Education$613,650Health$500,000Food & Nutrition$475,000Other$552,500International$300,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION — $3,037,500 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $1,755,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetOJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN — $1,350,133 over 8y, 23% of budgetHELP OF OJAI INC — $705,000 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC — $425,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $300,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC — $265,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN — $210,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetLA WYLD — $50,000 over 2y, 96% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE — $38,650 over 3y, 18% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM — $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFeeding America — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOJAI COMMUNITY FARMERS MARKET — $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOjai Raptor Center — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER
  • Who funds OJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN
  • Who funds HELP OF OJAI INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds FOOD SHARE INC
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN
  • Who funds MLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds LA WYLD
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds OJAI COMMUNITY FARMERS MARKET
  • Who funds SOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Ojai Raptor Center
  • Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bruce Ford Brown Memorial TrustDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bruce Ford Brown Memorial Trust · David & Sylvia Weisz Foundation · California Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Southern Nazarene University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph