Skip to content

· Private foundation

Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.7MHealth$2.1MHousing & Shelter$1.8MFood & Nutrition$475kEducation$349kInternational$300kPublic Benefit$265kArts & Culture$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $500k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$607k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$400,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$250,000
FOOD SHARE INC$200,000
ARTCENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN$100,000
HELP OF OJAI$100,000
DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION$100,000
RADIANT CHURCH$25,000
LIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE$23,650
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
OJAI YOUTH ENTERTAINERS STUDIO$5,000
ZEFFY INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Downtown Womens Center: $260k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $250k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%downtown womens center: $225k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $210k → 14%direct relief foundation: $375k → 14%Downtown Womens Center: $200k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $225k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $200k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $225k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $200k → 14%direct relief foundation: $213k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $200k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $100k → 14%downtown womens center: $10k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%Direct Relief Foundation: $100k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
MO
DE
NM
KS
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 18 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$8.9M
$420k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+6%

Still filing today

72%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DW
    DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +285%
  • OV
    OJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +72%
  • HO
    HELP OF OJAI INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $705k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • AD
    Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Assco
    one grant, 2019 · $235k
  • MH
    MLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -91%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
9
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
10
Loma Linda University Medical Center

Our mission is to continue the healing ministry of jesus christ, "to make man whole," in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and…

Health
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ojai Community Farmers Market. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $3,037,500 · Human ServicesDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATIONDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,755,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTERHELP OF OJAI INC: $705,000 · Human ServicesHELP OF OJAI INCOJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN: $1,350,133 · PhilanthropyOJAI VALLEY COMM…+1 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $265,000 · EducationART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $210,000 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $40,000 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationLIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE: $38,650 · Education+1 more: $20,000 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500,000 · HealthFOOD SHARE INC: $425,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $25,000 · Food & NutritionOJAI COMMUNITY FARMERS MARKET: $25,000 · Food & NutritionAlzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Assco: $235,000 · OtherRADIANT CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherNational Hispanic Cultural Center Fdtn: $25,000 · OtherOJAI YOUTH ENTERTAINERS STUDIO: $25,000 · OtherLA WYLD: $50,000 · OtherMLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM: $35,000 · Other+9 more: $62,500 · OtherHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $300,000 · International
Human Services$5,497,500Philanthropy$1,370,133Education$613,650Health$500,000Food & Nutrition$475,000Other$552,500International$300,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $3,037,500 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,755,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetOJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN: $1,350,133 over 8y, 23% of budgetHELP OF OJAI INC: $705,000 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $425,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $300,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $265,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $210,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLA WYLD: $50,000 over 2y, 96% of budgetMLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE: $38,650 over 3y, 18% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFeeding America: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOJAI COMMUNITY FARMERS MARKET: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOjai Raptor Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN ↗
  • Who funds HELP OF OJAI INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds LA WYLD ↗
  • Who funds MLK HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIVING EDUCATION COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds OJAI COMMUNITY FARMERS MARKET ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Ojai Raptor Center ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bruce Ford Brown Memorial TrustDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bruce Ford Brown Memorial Trust · David & Sylvia Weisz Foundation · California Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Southern Nazarene University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Otis & Bettina Chandler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Otis & Bettina Chandler’s filings →

More from the funding graph