Skip to content
OTG Charities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

OTG Charities

OTG CHARITIES IS A DELAWARE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT SUPPORTS COMMUNITY CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES IN THE NEW YORK CITY AREA AND IN OTHER COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$416kEducation$123kArts & Culture$111kPhilanthropy$54kCommunity Improvement$22kHuman Services$21kEnvironment$16kYouth Development$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Houston Airports Charities and Community Affairs$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $8k → 13%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $1k → 13%UNITED WE CARE FUND: $14k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$642k · 12 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$642k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RALLY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $150k · revenue +208%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $57k · revenue +29%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $46k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -2%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • JG
    JETBLUE GRANTS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
2
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
3
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
4
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
American Culinary Federation Education Foundation Inc

To provide for education, scholarships and other charitable purposes related to the culinary profession

—
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
9
American Culinary Federation Inc

Promoting excellence, education, professionalism and collegiality in the culinary profession

—
10
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jetblue Grants Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED AIRLINES SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $110,000 · OtherUNITED AIRLINES SCHOLARSHIP FUNDSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $47,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDAT…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER: $16,320 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - SOUTHE…AIRPORT MINORITY ADVISORY COUNCIL CORPORATION: $15,000 · OtherAIRPORT MINORITY ADVISORY COUNCIL C…INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT INTERFAITH CHAPEL INC: $11,000 · Other+13 more: $53,300 · Other+13 moreRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyRALLY FOUNDATION INCUNITED WE CARE FUND: $29,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WE CARE FUNDJETBLUE GRANTS FOUNDATION: $13,500 · PhilanthropyJETBLUE GRANTS FOUNDATIONGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,240 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $56,827 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUND…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $53,700 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIE…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE…NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $8,000 · HealthAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureAPOLLO THEATER …Southern Smoke Foundation: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSouthern Smoke …THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $46,336 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED WE CARE EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUND: $13,500 · Human ServicesQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $8,500 · Human ServicesAIRPORT FOUNDATION MSP: $15,500 · Environment
Other$252,620Philanthropy$204,240Health$151,527Arts & Culture$110,000Public Safety & Disaster$46,336Human Services$22,000Environment$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $56,827 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $53,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $46,336 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WE CARE FUND: $29,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIRPORT FOUNDATION MSP: $15,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAIRPORT MINORITY ADVISORY COUNCIL CORPORATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJETBLUE GRANTS FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Smoke Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAREERS THROUGH CULINARY ARTS PROGRAM DBA CULINARY CAREERS PROGRAM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKennedy Airport Airlines Mgmt Council: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Pfizer Foundation…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization OTG Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from OTG Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on OTG Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home