Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

OTG Charities

OTG CHARITIES IS A DELAWARE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT SUPPORTS COMMUNITY CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES IN THE NEW YORK CITY AREA AND IN OTHER COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$416kEducation$123kArts & Culture$111kPhilanthropy$54kCommunity Improvement$22kHuman Services$21kEnvironment$16kYouth Development$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Houston Airports Charities and Community Affairs$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $8k → 13%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $1k → 13%UNITED WE CARE FUND: $14k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$642k · 12 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$642k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RALLY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $150k · revenue +208%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $57k · revenue +29%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $46k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -2%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • UW
    UNITED WE CARE EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +423%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
2
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
3
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
4
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

6
American Culinary Federation Education Foundation Inc

To provide for education, scholarships and other charitable purposes related to the culinary profession

7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
9
American Culinary Federation Inc

Promoting excellence, education, professionalism and collegiality in the culinary profession

10
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jetblue Grants Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Fallen First Responder Supp…Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED AIRLINES SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $110,000 · OtherUNITED AIRLINES SCHOLARSHIP FUNDSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $47,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDAT…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER — $16,320 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - SOUTHE…AIRPORT MINORITY ADVISORY COUNCIL CORPORATION — $15,000 · OtherAIRPORT MINORITY ADVISORY COUNCIL C…INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT INTERFAITH CHAPEL INC — $11,000 · Other+13 more — $53,300 · Other+13 moreRALLY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · PhilanthropyRALLY FOUNDATION INCUNITED WE CARE FUND — $29,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WE CARE FUNDJETBLUE GRANTS FOUNDATION — $13,500 · PhilanthropyJETBLUE GRANTS FOUNDATIONGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,240 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $56,827 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUND…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $53,700 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIE…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC — $25,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE…NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $8,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL FUND OF NEW YORK — $8,000 · HealthAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureAPOLLO THEATER …Southern Smoke Foundation — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSouthern Smoke …THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $46,336 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED WE CARE EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUND — $13,500 · Human ServicesQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE — $8,500 · Human ServicesAIRPORT FOUNDATION MSP — $15,500 · Environment
Other$252,620Philanthropy$204,240Health$151,527Arts & Culture$110,000Public Safety & Disaster$46,336Human Services$22,000Environment$15,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $56,827 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $53,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $46,336 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WE CARE FUND — $29,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIRPORT FOUNDATION MSP — $15,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAIRPORT MINORITY ADVISORY COUNCIL CORPORATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJETBLUE GRANTS FOUNDATION — $13,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Smoke Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE — $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL FUND OF NEW YORK — $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION — $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKennedy Airport Airlines Mgmt Council — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAREERS THROUGH CULINARY ARTS PROGRAM DBA CULINARY CAREERS PROGRAM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization OTG Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph