Skip to content
Osteopathic Heritage Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Osteopathic Heritage Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$51MHealth$14MHuman Services$5.0MFood & Nutrition$2.8MPhilanthropy$2.2MYouth Development$1.6MCommunity Improvement$420kHousing & Shelter$300kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $586k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+10 grants · $9.1M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$331M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,872,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$1,188,478
OHIO UNIVERSITY$1,188,477
OHIO UNIVERSITY$1,188,477
OHIO UNIVERSITY$1,188,477
THE BUCKEYE RANCH$333,333
ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES$332,500
COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$265,000
THE BUCKEYE RANCH$250,000
ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES$250,000
FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO$162,500
COMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK$150,000
LIFECARE ALLIANCE$150,000
HOCKING ATHENS PERRY COMMUNITY ACTION$150,000
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF OHIO$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $66k → 15%ST STEPHEN'S COMMUNITY HOUSE: $197k → 15%NEW DIRECTIONS CAREER CENTER: $50k → 15%NEW DIRECTIONS CAREER CENTER: $25k → 15%NEW DIRECTIONS CAREER CENTER: $25k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $333k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $250k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $167k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $144k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $144k → 15%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $99k → 15%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $60k → 15%ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $38k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $10k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $267k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $159k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $144k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $144k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $144k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $58k → 15%GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $41k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $15k → 15%GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $41k → 15%THE BUCKEYE RANCH: $10k → 15%ALVIS INC: $250k → 15%ALVIS INC: $204k → 15%ALVIS INC: $160k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $150k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $150k → 15%ALVIS INC: $144k → 15%ALVIS INC: $133k → 15%ALVIS INC: $89k → 15%ALVIS INC: $89k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $75k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $69k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $69k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $50k → 15%ALVIS INC: $48k → 15%ALVIS INC: $15k → 15%ALVIS INC: $10k → 15%ALVIS INC: $10k → 15%CLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER: $160k → 15%CLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER: $160k → 15%FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $100k → 15%FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $100k → 15%FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $50k → 15%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $35k → 15%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $35k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OH
PA
NJ
WV
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Osteopathic Heritage Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 91%.

Osteopathic Heritage Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87M · 54 repeat orgs$660k to everyone else

54 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
21

Total granted

$87M
$503k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+29%

Still filing today

83%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Ohio University Foundation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +200%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES
    7× · 2018–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +33%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO
    5× · 2018–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FF
    FINANCE FUND CAPITAL CORPORATION (HOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS)
    one grant, 2018 · $224k
  • SS
    ST STEPHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $197k · revenue +68%
  • RU
    ROWAN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
2
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
3
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
4
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
5
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
6
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
7
Association of Ohio Health Commissioners

The mission of aohc is to provide exceptional service to its members and to advance the mission of public health to prevent, promote and protect the health of the community by developing and maintaining strong local public health…

—
8
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
9
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
10
Ohio Professionals Health Program

To facilitate the health and wellbeing of healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care and safety.

Health
11
Columbus Medical Association Foundation Unlimited

To provide health and wellness services without geographic restriction.

International
12
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Healthcolumbus Dba Health Impact Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Harmony Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/63
Grantees still filing
40/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO UNIVERSITY: $54,879,494 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYADAMH BOARD OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $2,500,000 · OtherST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $2,480,300 · Other+37 more: $11,273,512 · Other+37 moreTHE BUCKEYE RANCH INC: $1,992,350 · Human ServicesALVIS INC: $1,157,375 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $435,500 · Human ServicesETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $369,644 · Human ServicesCLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER: $319,834 · Human ServicesFURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $250,000 · Human ServicesST STEPHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $196,749 · Human Services+7 more: $397,960 · Human ServicesThe Ohio University Foundation: $3,205,150 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $483,796 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF OHIO: $190,000 · Education+1 more: $25,480 · EducationMARYHAVEN INC: $1,948,700 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF OHIO INC: $625,000 · HealthNORTH COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTERS INC: $343,700 · HealthLOWER LIGHTS CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $180,000 · HealthSYNTERO INC: $114,500 · Health+7 more: $160,530 · HealthUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $995,841 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $993,105 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO: $372,500 · Philanthropy+3 more: $8,042 · PhilanthropyLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $1,316,666 · Food & NutritionDUBLIN FOOD PANTRY: $188,000 · Food & NutritionFRANKLINTON FARMS: $140,020 · Food & NutritionDIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $1,615,450 · Youth Development
Other$71,133,306Human Services$5,119,412Education$3,904,426Health$3,372,430Philanthropy$2,369,488Food & Nutrition$1,644,686Youth Development$1,615,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $3,205,150 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $2,480,300 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO: $2,296,782 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $2,275,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BUCKEYE RANCH INC: $1,992,350 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMARYHAVEN INC: $1,948,700 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetDIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $1,615,450 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $1,316,666 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetALVIS INC: $1,157,375 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $995,841 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $993,105 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF OHIO INC: $625,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $483,796 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $435,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetPRODUCE PERKS MIDWEST INC: $402,475 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO: $372,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOMPDRUG INC: $371,709 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES: $369,644 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetNORTH COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTERS INC: $343,700 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSTUARTS OPERA HOUSE: $338,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetCLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER: $319,834 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION: $284,473 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $255,016 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $250,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPHYSICIANS CARE CONNECTION: $201,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF OHIO: $190,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetDUBLIN FOOD PANTRY: $188,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION: $180,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOWER LIGHTS CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $180,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPartners Achieving Community Transformation Inc: $168,050 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetFRANKLINTON FARMS: $140,020 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO: $137,090 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSYNTERO INC: $114,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS CAREER CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $81,770 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetINTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $72,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetLEGAL AID OF SOUTHEAST AND CENTRAL OHIO: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN CLEM RECOVERY HOUSE: $70,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetATHENS PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECT: $70,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetOHIO OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $54,430 over 5y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $44,225 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,480 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetConcord Counseling Services: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN CLUB: $13,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds THE BUCKEYE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYHAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ALVIS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODUCE PERKS MIDWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds COMPDRUG INC ↗
  • Who funds ETHIOPIAN TEWAHEDO SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds STUARTS OPERA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CLINTONVILLE-BEECHWOLD COMMUNITY RESOURCES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIANS CARE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds ST STEPHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF OHIO ↗
  • Who funds DUBLIN FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds HOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds LOWER LIGHTS CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Partners Achieving Community Transformation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationUnited Way of Central…American Electric Pow…Harry C Moores Founda…Ingram-White Castle F…Cardinal Health Found…Siemer Family Foundat…L Brands FoundationEncova Foundation of …Nisource Charitable F…Community Foundations…Community Shelter Boa…
Columbus FoundationOH65.8× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · Cardinal Health Foundation · Siemer Family Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Encova Foundation of Ohio · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Community Foundations Inc · Community Shelter Board

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Osteopathic Heritage Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Osteopathic Heritage Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Osteopathic Heritage Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Osteopathic Heritage Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Osteopathic Heritage’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home