· Private foundation
Ormjmp Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE | $975,000 |
| REGENTS OF UCSF | $307,692 |
| NORTHEAST FLORIDA BUILDERS ASSOCIATION | $287,500 |
| THE FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY | $230,000 |
| PROJECT OPIOID | $200,000 |
| OPERATION NEW HOPE | $200,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY INC | $185,760 |
| AMIKIDS INC | $162,500 |
| FOUNDATION FOR THE DEFENCE OF DEMOCRACIES | $125,000 |
| LOUIS D BRANDEIS CENTER | $125,000 |
| CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL | $120,000 |
| READ USA | $100,000 |
| ABC INSTITUTE INC | $75,000 |
| COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $458k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNortheast Florida Builders Association Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $425k · revenue +16%
- CFCentral Fund of Israel2× · 2023–2024 · $420k · revenue +31%
- ONOperation New Hope Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- CFCENTRAL FLORIDA URBAN LEAGUEone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -38%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $200k
- DMDELTA MONTROSE YOUTH SERVICES INCone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -5% · 26% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…
To provide citizens with independent research on government fiscal policy and to promote the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars
Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.
The institute for defense analyses is organized for the purpose of applied research. the institute for defense analyses provides independent and objective scientific and technological expertise to assist national security decision-makers…
To protect the fundamental rights of all employers, users, and employees to work and participate equally in the free enterprise system without fear of violence, intimidation or discrimination as guaranteed to such employers, users, and…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Government Accountability Inc and the most unlike its peers is Abingdon Square Alliance Dba Abingdon Square Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Northeast Florida Builders Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds Operation New Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds READ USA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL FLORIDA URBAN LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds ABC INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds CONSUMER ENERGY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DELTA MONTROSE YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds INVESTIGATIVE RESEARCH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIAKONIA INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Entrepreneurial Jewish Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION INC ↗
- Who funds ABINGDON SQUARE ALLIANCE DBA ABINGDON SQUARE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ormjmp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Diakonia Inc — 51% of income from government
- Operation New Hope Inc — 13% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Read Usa Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.