Skip to content
OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
29
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$802kHuman Services$772kEducation$479kPublic Safety & Disaster$355kEmployment$275kYouth Development$195kCrime & Legal$121kHousing & Shelter$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $777k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $700k
$20,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American National Red Cross$125,000
Reading Is Fundamental Inc$125,000
Convoy of Hope$125,000
Feeding America$125,000
Wilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc$50,000
Redeem Programs$50,000
Great Jobs KC Inc$50,000
Trails of Purpose$50,000
Payson Senior Center$35,000
DREAM Alive Inc$30,000
The Food Basket Inc$30,000
St Augustine Youth Services$30,000
Beaufort County Community College$30,000
Juma Ventures$30,000
Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence Inc$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $827k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $15k → 11%Assistance League of Tucson Inc: $25k → 15%Payson Senior Center: $35k → 19%Family Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc: $10k → 10%Riverside County Foundation on Aging Inc: $10k → 11%Medical Motor Service of Rochester and Monroe County Inc: $25k → 14%Any Baby Can of San Antonio Inc: $25k → 16%American National Red Cross: $125k → 14%Family Crisis Centers Inc: $25k → 8%Ready for Good Co: $15k → 15%Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence Inc: $30k → 14%Mayville Open Door Inc: $10k → 9%Dallas High Shoals Christi Social Ministry: $7k → 12%Hands of The Carpenter: $5k → 7%SafeHouse Denver Inc: $10k → 12%Child Care Action Council of Thurston County: $10k → 9%Covenant House Alaska: $15k → 10%Orchard Village: $10k → 14%Ramp Access Made Possible by Students: $10k → 6%Trails of Purpose: $50k → 9%Payson Senior Center: $30k → 19%Riverside County Foundation on Aging Inc: $5k → 11%Any Baby Can of San Antonio: $20k → 16%Adult Development Center of Benton County Inc: $10k → 8%New Life Center: $20k → 11%Children's Bereavement Center of South Texas: $10k → 16%American National Red Cross: $100k → 14%Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence Inc: $25k → 14%SOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $10k → 14%American National Red Cross: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $30k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

OReilly Automotive Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 17 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
27

Total granted

$1.8M
$386k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $763k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentCrime & LegalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $355k · revenue +27%
  • Feeding America
    5× · 2021–2025 · $355k · revenue +23%
  • RI
    READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $330k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • A
    ACCESS
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • FC
    FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • SE
    South East Missouri Network Against Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
2
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
3
The Center for Women and Families Inc

To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.

Human Services
4
Hope's Door New Beginning Center

The mission of hope's door new beginning center is to offer intervention and prevention services to individuals and families affected by intimate partner and family violence and to provide education programs that enhance the community's…

Human Services
5
Center for Community Services

The center for community services empowers families to break the cycle of poverty through crisis assistance and employment readiness.

Human Services
6
Career Opportunity Development Inc

To assist individuals with disabilities and disadvantages to live independent lives.

Health
7
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
8
Community Action Inc

Community action, inc. partners with community members to improve low- income situations by assisting families with activities to overcome barriers, improve economic status, and enhance their quality of life.

Human Services
9
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
10
Family Assistance Program

Our agency provides tools necessary to create healthy interpersonal relationships, economic empowerment, and stable housing for victims of domestic violence, their children and runaway youth.

—
11
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
12
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Against Poverty Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trails of Purpose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
76/77
Grantees still filing
37/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $355,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its C…WILD IRIS FAMILY COUNSELING & CRISIS CENTER: $75,000 · Human ServicesWILD IRIS FAMILY COUNSELING & CRISI…PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INCSOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $65,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST …Safe Harbor Center Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesSafe Harbor Center IncTRAILS OF PURPOSE: $50,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTER: $45,000 · Human ServicesANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $45,000 · Human Services+19 more: $256,500 · Human Services+19 moreREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $330,000 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAME…GREAT JOBS KC INC: $50,000 · EducationGREAT JOBS KC INCCareers CLiC: $50,000 · EducationCareers CLiCMANNA CAFE MINISTRIES: $45,000 · EducationMANNA CAFE MINISTR…COMP-U-DOPT INC: $30,000 · EducationCOMP-U-DOPT INC+3 more: $35,000 · Education+3 moreFeeding America: $355,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ameri…THE FOOD BASKET INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BASK…+2 more: $15,000 · Food & NutritionLA RAZA SERVICES INC: $75,000 · OtherLA RAZA SERVICES INCUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTE…UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $30,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $30,000 · OtherBeaufort County Community College: $30,000 · OtherACCESS: $25,000 · OtherSouth East Missouri Network Against Inc: $25,000 · OtherHAVEN: $25,000 · OtherChildren's Advocacy Center of North and Northwest Cook Co: $25,000 · OtherWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc: $50,000 · OtherWilmington Area Rebuil…HOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE: $25,000 · OtherDREAM ALIVE INC: $30,000 · OtherTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+18 more: $211,897 · Other+18 moreCONVOY OF HOPE: $356,604 · InternationalCONVOY OF HO…JUMA VENTURES INC: $60,000 · EmploymentVALLEY PACKAGING INDUSTRIES INC: $50,000 · EmploymentHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $25,000 · EmploymentHOUSTON'S CAPITAL INVESTING IN DEVELOP- MENT AND EMPLOYMENT OF ADULTS INC: $20,000 · EmploymentSkillpoint Alliance: $20,000 · EmploymentThe Lift Garage: $10,000 · Employment+1 more: $5,000 · EmploymentREDEEM PROGRAMS: $50,000 · Crime & LegalCAC FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY: $25,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC: $10,360 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$1,016,500Education$540,000Food & Nutrition$400,000Other$651,897International$356,604Employment$190,000Crime & Legal$131,360

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $356,604 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $355,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $355,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $330,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWILD IRIS FAMILY COUNSELING & CRISIS CENTER: $75,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetLA RAZA SERVICES INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $65,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $65,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetJUMA VENTURES INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSafe Harbor Center Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRAILS OF PURPOSE: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREAT JOBS KC INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY PACKAGING INDUSTRIES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCareers CLiC: $50,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMANNA CAFE MINISTRIES: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCAC FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDREAM ALIVE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetACCESS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHAVEN: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVIVA PIMA: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNew Life Center: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUSA CARES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSTON'S CAPITAL INVESTING IN DEVELOP- MENT AND EMPLOYMENT OF ADULTS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDIGITAL NEST INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMENTOR Washington: $15,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetArizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRIVERSIDE COUNTY FOUNDATION ON AGING: $15,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetSUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC: $10,360 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMayville Open Door Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORCHARD VILLAGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Diane and Bruce H…Charities Aid Foundat…Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesNina Mason Pulliam Ch…National Children's A…Union Pacific Foundat…Enterprise Holdings F…Otto Bremer TrustWashington Federal Fo…Employees Community F…The Albertsons Compan…
The Diane and Bruce Halle FoundationAZ17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · National Children's Alliance Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Washington Federal Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Albertsons Companies Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Knox Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on OReilly Automotive’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home