Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
29
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

Food & Nutrition$802kHuman Services$772kEducation$479kPublic Safety & Disaster$355kEmployment$275kYouth Development$195kCrime & Legal$121kHousing & Shelter$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $777k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $700k
$20,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Feeding America$125,000
American National Red Cross$125,000
Convoy of Hope$125,000
Reading Is Fundamental Inc$125,000
Redeem Programs$50,000
Wilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc$50,000
Great Jobs KC Inc$50,000
Trails of Purpose$50,000
Payson Senior Center$35,000
Beaufort County Community College$30,000
St Augustine Youth Services$30,000
Juma Ventures$30,000
United Against Poverty$30,000
Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence Inc$30,000
Comp-U-Dopt Inc$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $827k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $15k → 11%Assistance League of Tucson Inc: $25k → 15%Payson Senior Center: $35k → 19%Family Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc: $10k → 10%Riverside County Foundation on Aging Inc: $10k → 11%Medical Motor Service of Rochester and Monroe County Inc: $25k → 14%Any Baby Can of San Antonio Inc: $25k → 16%American National Red Cross: $125k → 14%Family Crisis Centers Inc: $25k → 8%Ready for Good Co: $15k → 15%Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence Inc: $30k → 14%Mayville Open Door Inc: $10k → 9%Dallas High Shoals Christi Social Ministry: $7k → 12%Hands of The Carpenter: $5k → 7%SafeHouse Denver Inc: $10k → 12%Child Care Action Council of Thurston County: $10k → 9%Covenant House Alaska: $15k → 10%Orchard Village: $10k → 14%Ramp Access Made Possible by Students: $10k → 6%Trails of Purpose: $50k → 9%Payson Senior Center: $30k → 19%Riverside County Foundation on Aging Inc: $5k → 11%Any Baby Can of San Antonio: $20k → 16%Adult Development Center of Benton County Inc: $10k → 8%New Life Center: $20k → 11%Children's Bereavement Center of South Texas: $10k → 16%American National Red Cross: $100k → 14%Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence Inc: $25k → 14%SOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $10k → 14%American National Red Cross: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $30k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

OReilly Automotive Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 17 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
27

Total granted

$1.8M
$386k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+5%

Still filing today

100%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $763k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentCrime & LegalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $355k · revenue +27%
  • Feeding America
    5× · 2021–2025 · $355k · revenue +23%
  • RI
    READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $330k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • A
    ACCESS
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • SE
    South East Missouri Network Against Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
2
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
3
The Center for Women and Families Inc

To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.

Human Services
4
Hope's Door New Beginning Center

The mission of hope's door new beginning center is to offer intervention and prevention services to individuals and families affected by intimate partner and family violence and to provide education programs that enhance the community's…

Human Services
5
Center for Community Services

The center for community services empowers families to break the cycle of poverty through crisis assistance and employment readiness.

Human Services
6
Career Opportunity Development Inc

To assist individuals with disabilities and disadvantages to live independent lives.

Health
7
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
8
Community Action Inc

Community action, inc. partners with community members to improve low- income situations by assisting families with activities to overcome barriers, improve economic status, and enhance their quality of life.

Human Services
9
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
10
Family Assistance Program

Our agency provides tools necessary to create healthy interpersonal relationships, economic empowerment, and stable housing for victims of domestic violence, their children and runaway youth.

—
11
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
12
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Against Poverty Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trails of Purpose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Developmental Disabilities …Veteran Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesEarly Childhood Education C…Native Hawaiian Community D…Land Conservation Organizat…Public School District Foun…Child and Family ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Pantries & AssistanceLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Elementary Literacy Tutoring
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/77
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,488

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
76/77
Grantees still filing
36/77
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $355,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its C…WILD IRIS FAMILY COUNSELING & CRISIS CENTER — $75,000 · Human ServicesWILD IRIS FAMILY COUNSELING & CRISI…SOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $65,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST …PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INCSafe Harbor Center Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesSafe Harbor Center IncTRAILS OF PURPOSE — $50,000 · Human ServicesANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTER — $45,000 · Human Services+19 more — $256,500 · Human Services+19 moreREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC — $330,000 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAME…GREAT JOBS KC INC — $50,000 · EducationGREAT JOBS KC INCCareers CLiC — $50,000 · EducationCareers CLiCMANNA CAFE MINISTRIES — $45,000 · EducationMANNA CAFE MINISTR…COMP-U-DOPT INC — $30,000 · EducationCOMP-U-DOPT INC+3 more — $35,000 · Education+3 moreFeeding America — $355,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ameri…THE FOOD BASKET INC — $30,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BASK…+2 more — $15,000 · Food & NutritionLA RAZA SERVICES INC — $75,000 · OtherLA RAZA SERVICES INCUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION — $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTE…Beaufort County Community College — $30,000 · OtherUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $30,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $30,000 · OtherACCESS — $25,000 · OtherSouth East Missouri Network Against Inc — $25,000 · OtherChildren's Advocacy Center of North and Northwest Cook Co — $25,000 · OtherHAVEN — $25,000 · OtherWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc — $50,000 · OtherWilmington Area Rebuil…HOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE — $25,000 · OtherDREAM ALIVE INC — $30,000 · OtherTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Other+18 more — $211,897 · Other+18 moreCONVOY OF HOPE — $356,604 · InternationalCONVOY OF HO…JUMA VENTURES INC — $60,000 · EmploymentVALLEY PACKAGING INDUSTRIES INC — $50,000 · EmploymentHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC — $25,000 · EmploymentHOUSTON'S CAPITAL INVESTING IN DEVELOP- MENT AND EMPLOYMENT OF ADULTS INC — $20,000 · EmploymentSkillpoint Alliance — $20,000 · EmploymentThe Lift Garage — $10,000 · Employment+1 more — $5,000 · EmploymentREDEEM PROGRAMS — $50,000 · Crime & LegalCAC FOUNDATION INC — $36,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY — $25,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC — $10,360 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$1,016,500Education$540,000Food & Nutrition$400,000Other$651,897International$356,604Employment$190,000Crime & Legal$131,360

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $356,604 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $355,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $355,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC — $330,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWILD IRIS FAMILY COUNSELING & CRISIS CENTER — $75,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetLA RAZA SERVICES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $65,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC — $65,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSafe Harbor Center Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJUMA VENTURES INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTRAILS OF PURPOSE — $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetGREAT JOBS KC INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVALLEY PACKAGING INDUSTRIES INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCareers CLiC — $50,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetMANNA CAFE MINISTRIES — $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCAC FOUNDATION INC — $36,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetACCESS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVIVA PIMA — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHAVEN — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDIGITAL NEST INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUSA CARES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSTON'S CAPITAL INVESTING IN DEVELOP- MENT AND EMPLOYMENT OF ADULTS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNew Life Center — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMENTOR Washington — $15,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE COUNTY FOUNDATION ON AGING — $15,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC — $10,360 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFamilies Forward Charlotte Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWISCONSIN REGIONAL TRAINING PARTNERSHIP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetORCHARD VILLAGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Diane and Bruce H…Charities Aid Foundat…Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesNina Mason Pulliam Ch…National Children's A…Union Pacific Foundat…Enterprise Holdings F…Otto Bremer TrustWashington Federal Fo…Employees Community F…The Albertsons Compan…
The Diane and Bruce Halle FoundationAZ17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · National Children's Alliance Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Washington Federal Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Albertsons Companies Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Access — 65% of income from government
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Knox Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to OReilly Automotive Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines