Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oppenheim Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$381k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$137kEducation$116kArts & Culture$66kHousing & Shelter$65kYouth Development$55kPhilanthropy$46kInternational$17kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $265k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES$60,000
KEYSTONE COLLEGE$55,000
BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF NEPA$50,000
EVERHART MUSEUM$50,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF NEPA$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
OUTREACH CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOU$30,000
SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$16,024
FRIENDS OF THE POOR$15,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS NEPA$3,500
ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUTREACH CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOU: $30k → 13%UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CTRS: $3k → 13%UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CTRS: $2k → 13%UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CTRS: $2k → 13%OUTREACH CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOU: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$553k · 29 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2022, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
8

Total granted

$553k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+180%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART
    5× · 2017–2022 · $57k · revenue +23%
  • OC
    OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $31k · revenue +156%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES
    2× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • RU
    RAC - UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • LH
    LACKAWANNA HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +144%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scranton-Lackawanna Resources Development Corporation

To provide affordable housing to people of lackawanna county

Human Services
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
Susquehanna University

Susquehanna university educates students for productive, creative and reflective lives of achievement, leadership, and service in a diverse, dynamic and interdependent world.

Education
4
Scranton Primary Health Care Center

The center provides comprehensive health and dental services for residents of scranton pa and other communities in lackawanna and surrounding counties.

Health
5
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Human Resources Center Inc

Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.

Human Services
8
Human Services Center

Human services center is a comprehensive community behavioral healthcare provider that provides mental health and development disability services to lawrence county residents.

Human Services
9
Adamstown Area Library

The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…

Education
10
Susquehanna Physician Services

Susquehanna physician services is a subsidiary of the exempt entity upmc suquehanna. our vision is to create an integrated community health system that delivers world class care. our values are to carefully place our patients and their…

Health
11
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
12
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Lackawanna Wayne and Pike Counties; the most unlike its peers is The Fortune Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEYSTONE COLLEGE: $74,125 · OtherKEYSTONE COLLEGEUNITED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $65,000 · OtherUNITED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICESJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF NEPA: $60,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF NEPAIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF NEPA: $55,000 · OtherBOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF NEPAHUNTER COLLEGE BROOKDALE: $35,000 · OtherHUNTER COLLEGE BROOKDALEIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES: $20,025 · Other+22 more: $92,800 · Other+22 moreEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART: $57,000 · Arts & CultureEVERHART M…OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $31,000 · Human ServicesUNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $6,800 · Human ServicesSCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $17,024 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Scranton: $3,500 · EducationMarywood University: $3,000 · EducationJEWISH HOME OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELAN SKILLED NURSING AND REHAB: $3,000 · HealthTHE MACULA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthCENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $1,000 · HealthTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthLACKAWANNA PRO BONO INC: $3,150 · Crime & Legal
Other$481,950Arts & Culture$57,000Human Services$37,800Philanthropy$17,024Education$6,500Health$6,500Crime & Legal$3,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKEYSTONE COLLEGE: $74,125 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART: $57,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetOUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $31,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES: $20,025 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $17,024 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOR: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWRC INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Scranton: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLACKAWANNA PRO BONO INC: $3,150 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH HOME OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELAN SKILLED NURSING AND REHAB: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMarywood University: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MACULA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLACKAWANNA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KEYSTONE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds SCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds WRC INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds University of Scranton ↗
  • Who funds LACKAWANNA PRO BONO INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELAN SKILLED NURSING AND REHAB ↗
  • Who funds Marywood University ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MACULA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LACKAWANNA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walter L Schautz FoundationPA28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walter L Schautz Foundation · The Hawk Family Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Eureka Foundation · The Ross Family Foundation · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Rosenberg Charitable Foundation · Margaret Briggs Foundation · Robert H Spitz Foundation · Allone Charities · William G McGowan Charitable Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oppenheim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oppenheim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oppenheim’s filings →

    More from the funding graph