Skip to content
Open Hearts for Orphans Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Open Hearts for Orphans Inc

To provide for the needs of orphans worldwide through medical intervention, financial assistance for adoptive families, and providing the most basic necessities.

$592k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$692kHuman Services$72kReligion$45kHealth$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $244,398, the rows itemized in this filing. The $592,167 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $347,769 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
$13,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$187k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC$112,580
LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION$30,877
UPASUAJI INTERNATIONAL$29,948
GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION$16,000
LIFELINE CHILDRENS SERVICES$13,000
GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT$11,993
AMERICA WORLD ADOPTIONS$10,000
CHILDRENS HOUSE INTERNATIONAL$8,000
GLOBAL ADOPTION SERVICES$6,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%FOSTER FAMILY ALLIANCE OF NC: $10k → 13%CCAI: $10k → 8%Love Them All: $9k → 16%AMERICA WORLD ADOPTIONS: $10k → 6%GLOBAL ADOPTION SERVICES: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
CO
MO
VA
AR
NC
AL
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $275k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$275k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ORPHAN CARE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$752k · 7 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$752k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+34%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    UGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $409k · 29% of their budget
  • LW
    LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $151k · revenue -5%
  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $66k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • UR
    Uganda Rural Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $124k
  • CG
    Compasio Global Child Advocates
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Deliver Rescuing Children At Risk

Finding forever homes for children

Human Services
2
Chinese Agape Foundation

Provide food, clothing, shelter, education, and medical care to underprivileged children in Asia.

Human Services
3
Childrens Global Alliance

Provide assistance with orphanages and schooling.

Human Services
4
United in Love Adoptions
Human Services
5
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
6
Mom-Orphanage Pro Inc

Provide assistance to children and widows globally

Youth Development
7
International Child Foundation Inc

International child foundation is organized to serve the needs of orphans as an adoption service provider and humanitarian organization.

—
8
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
9
Hope Adoption Inc

Adoption Counseling/International Adoption: To unite orphaned children from around the world with loving adoptive families to provide educational programs and continuing services to these families and to provide humanitarian aid to the…

Human Services
10
Childspring International Inc

Childspring International provides life-changing surgeries for children from developing countries and as a result transforms communities.

—
11
Global Orphan Hope

Global Orphan Hope seeks to serve by caring for orphans around the world. Global Orphan Hope believes that every child deserves to be loved, to feel secure, and to have a place to call home. When a child cannot remain with his/her family,…

Human Services
12
Global Family Care Network Inc

Protecting children and preserving families in vulnerable communities with an emphasis on the prevention, intervention, and restoration of young victims of commercial sexual exploitation and human trafficking. The organization works in the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Upasuaji International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC: $408,580 · InternationalUGANDA RURAL FUND USA INCLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $66,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INCCOMPASIO GLOBAL INC: $38,180 · InternationalCOMPASIO GLOBAL INCUpasuaji International: $29,948 · InternationalADORER MISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $20,000 · International+2 more: $12,000 · InternationalUganda Rural Fund: $124,020 · OtherUganda Rural FundCompasio Global Child Advocates: $70,183 · OtherCompasio Global Child Advoca…CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $36,500 · OtherCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INCIndividual grant recipient: $23,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE GLADNEY CENTER GFA'S - GROUP RETURN: $16,000 · OtherTHE GLADNEY CENTER GFA'S - G…+1 more: $8,000 · OtherLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION: $150,560 · HealthLOVE WITHOUT BO…AMERICA WORLD ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCCAI: $10,000 · Human ServicesFoster Family Alliance of North Carolina: $10,000 · Human ServicesLOVE THEM ALL: $9,350 · Human ServicesGLOBAL ADOPTION SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $31,000 · ReligionTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $20,859 · Philanthropy
International$574,708Other$278,403Health$150,560Human Services$51,350Religion$31,000Philanthropy$20,859

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC: $408,580 over 4y, 29% of budgetLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION: $150,560 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $66,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $20,859 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADORER MISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCCAI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFoster Family Alliance of North Carolina: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLOVE THEM ALL: $9,350 over 1y, 14% of budgetCHILDRENS HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHINA LITTLE FLOWER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Open Hearts for Orphans Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Open Hearts for Orphans Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Open Hearts for Orphans Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Open Hearts for Orphans Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Open Hearts for Orphans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home