Loading…
· Public charity
OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC
To provide for the needs of orphans worldwide through medical intervention, financial assistance for adoptive families, and providing the most basic necessities.
$365k
Granted FY2024
7
Grants
7
Communities
$118k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
International$432kHealth$120kHuman Services$29kReligion$18kPhilanthropy$9kOther$254k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
—
2023
ugandarurallicensed
2024
lovefosterforeigneducationlicensedugandarural
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $118k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
- UGANDA RURAL FUND$118,000
- LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES$22,151
- FOSTER FAMILY ALLIANCE OF NC$10,000
- CCAI$10,000
- GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT$8,866
- LIFELINE CHILDRENS SERVICES$8,000
- ALL GODS CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL$6,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 66% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$574k · 6 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
6
Total granted
$574k
$253k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+42%
+34%
Still filing today
67%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LWLove Without Boundaries Foundation3× · 2021–2024 · $120k · revenue +42%
- LFLifesong for Orphans2× · 2021–2022 · $66k · revenue +98%
- LCLIFELINE CHILDRENS SERVICES2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +159%
Funded once
- URUganda Rural Fundone grant, 2022 · $124k
- CGCompasio Global Child Advocatesone grant, 2022 · $70k
- LWLove Without Boundariesone grant, 2022 · $24k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Child Hope International
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ-centered care, training and social work.
Arts & Culture
2
Serving Orphans Worldwide Inc
Serving Orphans Worldwide betters the lives of orphans by rescuing struggling orphanages, training them to provide quality care, and enabling them to pursue sustainability.
Food & Nutrition
3
Childrens Global Alliance
Provide assistance with orphanages and schooling.
Human Services
4
International Christian Partners
Childrens Home and Ministry in India
Religion
5
Compassionate Life Foundation
Support orphans and widows locally, nationally, and internationally
—
6
Global Family Care Network Inc
Protecting children and preserving families in vulnerable communities with an emphasis on the prevention, intervention, and restoration of young victims of commercial sexual exploitation and human trafficking. The organization works in the…
International
7
Hands of Hope Adoption & Orphan Care Ministry Inc
To uniquely and deeply love orphans at home and around the world. We do this by offering child sponsorships and sending teams to our partner Childrens Homes around the world and supporting families who are adopting and caring for children…
Human Services
8
Food for Orphans Inc
Contributions to various organization providing assistance to orphans throughout the world.
International
9
Forgotten Children Worldwide Inc
Forgotten children worldwide seeks to provide a loving and nurturing environment for orphans and vulnerable children by protecting them from becoming victims of extreme poverty and child trafficking so they can grow to fully understand the…
Human Services
10
Orphanos Foundation
Christian-based aid to orphans
Human Services
11
Orphans Light Inc
Support for children and families in Africa who are suffering from poverty, disease, and hunger. Education of American public about the plight of the children in Africa.
Human Services
12
Global Impact Ministries Inc
Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.
Religion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adorer Missionary Sisters of the. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
International$432,180Other$254,403Health$119,683Human Services$29,350Religion$18,000Philanthropy$8,866
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Uganda Rural Fund USA Inc ↗
- Who funds Love Without Boundaries Foundation ↗
- Who funds Lifesong for Orphans ↗
- Who funds Compasio Global Inc ↗
- Who funds ADORER MISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE CHILDRENS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FOSTER FAMILY ALLIANCE OF NC ↗
- Who funds CCAI ↗
- Who funds Love Them All ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CHINA LITTLE FLOWER ↗
- Who funds ALL GODS CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Duke Energy FoundationNC11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Love Them All.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 832103262 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Love Them All, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Open Hearts for Orphans Inc?
Find your warmest path to Open Hearts for Orphans Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines