· Public charity
Open Hearts for Orphans Inc
To provide for the needs of orphans worldwide through medical intervention, financial assistance for adoptive families, and providing the most basic necessities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $183,017 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $364,783 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $181,766 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $118k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UGANDA RURAL FUND | $118,000 |
| LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES | $22,151 |
| FOSTER FAMILY ALLIANCE OF NC | $10,000 |
| CCAI | $10,000 |
| GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT | $8,866 |
| LIFELINE CHILDRENS SERVICES | $8,000 |
| ALL GODS CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $123k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: ORPHAN CARE
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- URUGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC3× · 2021–2024 · $296k · 29% of their budget
- LWLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $120k · revenue -13%
- LFLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC2× · 2021–2022 · $66k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- URUganda Rural Fundone grant, 2022 · $124k
- CGCompasio Global Child Advocatesone grant, 2022 · $70k
- LWLove Without Boundariesone grant, 2022 · $24k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support orphans and widows locally, nationally, and internationally
assisting orphans and missionary in need
Provide assistance to children and widows globally
Bring forth immediate and eternal hope to orphaned and at-risk children in locations around the world. We advocate for on-the-ground individuals and groups by connecting them with people and resources in support of a strategy of child…
Contributions to various organization providing assistance to orphans throughout the world.
Provide food, shelter, education and medical care for orphans referred to the organization by the local authorities.
We support a childrens home in Uganda Every dime we raise goes to feed and clothe around 200 orphans We pay modest salaries for their 23 caregivers We also pay school fees bus fuel and maintenance medical expenses internet expenses and more
Provide food, clothing, shelter, education, and medical care to underprivileged children in Asia.
Childspring International provides life-changing surgeries for children from developing countries and as a result transforms communities.
Childrens Home and Ministry in India
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifesong for Orphans Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adorer Missionary Sisters of the Poor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASIO GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds ADORER MISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CCAI ↗
- Who funds Foster Family Alliance of North Carolina ↗
- Who funds LOVE THEM ALL ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHINA LITTLE FLOWER INC ↗
- Who funds ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Open Hearts for Orphans Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Open Hearts for Orphans Inc?
Find your warmest path to Open Hearts for Orphans Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.