Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Oneaz Credit Union

To provide our member-owners with responsive service, convenient access, consumer education, and value-added financial and related products and services, in a fiscally sound manner.

$915k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$392k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of Oneaz Credit Union’s FY2024 grant dollars went to One Az Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
5
’18
7
’19
3
’20
7
’21
10
’22
2
’23
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$2.2MCommunity Improvement$218kPublic Benefit$129kArts & Culture$58kRecreation & Sports$53kCivil Rights$40kAnimals$28kMembership Benefit$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $536,839 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $915,144 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $378,305 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
  • $250k+1 grant · $392k
$18,755
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$391,834
FILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$62,500
FC ARIZONA$26,250
WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS$18,755
STATE EMPLOYEE CHARITABLE CAMPAIGN$12,000
EMPOWERING LATINA LEADERS IN ARIZONA - ELLA$10,000
ONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
PEORIA DIAMOND CLUB$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $20k → 11%PRESCOTT FRONTIER DAYS INC: $9k → 14%ARIZONA STATE CAPITAL MUSEUM GUILD: $20k → 15%HIGH COUNTRY HUMANE: $9k → 16%WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS: $19k → 10%BANZAI INC: $37k → 8%MOUNTAIN WEST CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $18k → 11%ARIZONA STATE CAPITAL MUSEUM GUILD: $11k → 15%NORTHERN AZ HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS: $10k → 10%FC ARIZONA: $26k → 11%ARIZONA STATE CAPITAL MUSEUM GUILD: $10k → 15%WORLD COUNCIL OF CREDIT UNIONS: $10k → 10%VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $17k → 11%ARIZONA STATE CAPITAL MUSEUM GUILD: $10k → 15%WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS: $10k → 10%GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $10k → 15%WORLD COUNCIL OF CREDIT UNIONS: $10k → 10%ONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%TUSCON RODEO PARADE COMMITTEE INC: $8k → 15%WORLD COUNCIL OF CREDIT UNIONS: $10k → 10%ONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%THE NATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%ONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%EMPOWERING LATINA LEADERS IN ARIZONA - ELLA: $10k → 11%STATE EMPLOYEE CHARITABLE CAMPAIGN: $20k → 11%FILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $63k → 10%STATE EMPLOYEE CHARITABLE CAMPAIGN: $20k → 11%STATE EMPLOYEE CHARITABLE CAMPAIGN: $14k → 11%STATE EMPLOYEE CHARITABLE CAMPAIGN: $12k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $452k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $399k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $392k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $290k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $263k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $217k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $61k → 11%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 11%ONEAZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $53k → 11%LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA: $55k → 11%LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA: $53k → 11%LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA: $25k → 11%MOUNTAIN WEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION: $8k → 11%ARIZONA ELK SOCIETY: $12k → 11%WILDLIFE FOR TOMORROW FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WILDLIFE FOR TOMORROW FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$424k · 8 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$424k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WORLD COUNCIL OF CREDIT UNIONS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $76k · revenue +35%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF ARIZONAS WILDLIFE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $18k · revenue +17%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • BI
    BANZAI INC
    one grant, 2022 · $37k
  • MW
    MOUNTAIN WEST CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -36%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gowest Credit Union Association

Provide products and services to arizona, colorado, idaho, oregon, washington and wyoming credit unions that enable credit unions to better serve their members.

—
2
Arizona Capital Source

Promoting and assisting the growth and development of the arizona economy.

—
3
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
4
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
5
One Arizona

One arizonas mission is to increase civic participation among arizonans

Civil Rights
6
Arizona Wildlife Federation

Arizona Wildlife Federation's purpose is to promote and encourage the conservation, propagation, development and management of fish, game and other wildlife; to promote and encourage the wise use, conservation and restoration of waters,…

Animals
7
Greater Phoenix Economic Council

The organization's mission is to attract and grow quality businesses and advocate for greater phoenix's competitiveness.

Community Improvement
8
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

—
9
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
10
American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona

To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.

—
11
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
12
Arizona Grantmakers Forum

To encourage, assist, promote private philanthropy to increase the awareness, appreciation, effectiveness of private philanthropy by providing information, networking opportunities, technical assistance, related services to private…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health First Foundation-Northern Arizona and the most unlike its peers is One Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

One Az Community Foundation Inc — $2,127,033 · PhilanthropyOne Az Community Foundation Inc+1 more — $55,113 · PhilanthropyWORLD COUNCIL OF CREDIT UNIONS INC — $75,635 · OtherWORLD COUNCIL O…State of Arizona — $66,000 · OtherState of Arizon…ARIZONA STATE CAPITAL MUSEUM GUILD — $50,833 · OtherARIZONA STATE C…BANZAI INC — $37,000 · OtherBANZAI INCFC ARIZONA — $26,250 · OtherFC ARIZONAMOUNTAIN WEST CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherNATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION — $13,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA — $12,800 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF ARIZONAS WILDLIFE — $17,798 · Other+8 more — $66,180 · Other+8 moreLOCAL FIRST FOR BUSINESS — $132,500 · Community ImprovementFILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $62,500 · Public BenefitONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Public Safety & DisasterArizona Elk Society — $12,000 · AnimalsPAW PLACEMENT OF NORTHERN ARIZONA — $8,984 · AnimalsArizona Humane Society — $7,500 · AnimalsSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC — $12,648 · Recreation & SportsPEORIA DIAMOND CLUB — $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$2,182,146Other$380,996Community Improvement$132,500Public Benefit$62,500Public Safety & Disaster$40,000Animals$28,484Recreation & Sports$18,148

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOne Az Community Foundation Inc — $2,127,033 over 8y, 88% of budgetLOCAL FIRST FOR BUSINESS — $132,500 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetWORLD COUNCIL OF CREDIT UNIONS INC — $75,635 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $62,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY — $55,113 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetMOUNTAIN WEST CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION — $13,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA — $12,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC — $12,648 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetArizona Elk Society — $12,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEMPOWERING LATINA LEADERS IN ARIZONA — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPrescott Frontier Days Inc — $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPAW PLACEMENT OF NORTHERN ARIZONA — $8,984 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTH FIRST FOUNDATION-NORTHERN ARIZONA — $7,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN WEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHANDLER COMPADRES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetArizona Humane Society — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC — $6,880 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEORIA DIAMOND CLUB — $5,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Bellco FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arizona Community FoundationAZ17.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Bellco Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oneaz Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines