Loading…
· Community foundation
ONE VOICE FOUNDATION
ONE VOICE FOUNDATION guides generous givers in directing their resources to make life changing impact in the community.
$112k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
2
Communities
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0163% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Philanthropy$190kHealth$82kYouth Development$40kHousing & Shelter$14kCivil Rights$6kOther$192k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
—
2021
education
2022
—
2023
counselingpregnancyevery
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$27,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- NCF OHIO$40,000
- COMMUNITY OF HOPE FREE HEALTH CLINI$27,250
- TOLEDO GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION$25,000
- MISSION INCREASE$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 86% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$407k · 5 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +91% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
6
Total granted
$407k
$69k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+109%
+91%
Still filing today
80%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NONCF OHIO5× · 2020–2024 · $170k · revenue +109%
- CHCOMPASSION HEALTH TOLEDO3× · 2018–2020 · $60k · revenue +532%
- RPRIDGE PROJECT INC2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- CICALEB INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIESone grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -21%
- HCHENRY COUNTY HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +13%
- CSCHERRY STREET MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Life Choices Medical Center
Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions
Human Services
2
Life Connection of Ohio
Secure organ and tissue donors and coordinate transplant services.
Health
3
Christus Trinity Clinic
Charitable, scientific, educational & religious purposes of advancing, promoting & supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations.
Health
4
Cleveland Clinic Mercy Hospital
To provide quality, compassionate and affordable healthcare services.
Health
5
The Pregnancy & Family Life Center
The Pregnancy and Family Life Center is a Christian ministry with a mission to: Engage, Educate and Empower women and men to choose life through a wholistic approach
Human Services
6
Faith Regional Health Services
To provide acute, skilled and outpatient services to individuals in our service area.
Health
7
The Christ Hospital
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
Health
8
The Toledo Hospital
The toledo hospital is an acute care facility and the adult tertiary facility of promedica health system, inc. providing inpatient and outpatient health services to the general public of northwest ohio and southeast michigan.
Health
9
Habitat for Humanity of Fulton County Ohio
Christian-based housing program
—
10
Covenant Health Network
The organization was established to administer and coordinate health services, promote general health of persons of the community served, and develop contracts and strategies to provide managed care and quality improvement services for…
Health
11
Life Choices Medical Clinic
Life choices medical clinic exists to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregnancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a committment to excellence…
Unclassified
12
Trinity Health Corporation
To provide health care system management and support
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cherry Street Mission Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Henry County Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$191,981Philanthropy$190,000Health$82,066Youth Development$40,000Housing & Shelter$13,700Civil Rights$5,580
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NCF OHIO ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION HEALTH TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds THAT NEIGHBORHOOD FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds RIDGE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE FREE HEALTH CLINI ↗
- Who funds MISSION INCREASE ↗
- Who funds CALEB INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HENRY COUNTY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds CHERRY STREET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds BELLA VITA NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Toledo Community Foundation IncOH17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The LaValley Foundation · Robert C and Susan M Savage · The O-I Charities Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ONE VOICE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THAT NEIGHBORHOOD FREE CLINIC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 271052744 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THAT NEIGHBORHOOD FREE CLINIC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 23% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to One Voice Foundation?
Find your warmest path to One Voice Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines