Skip to content
One Valley Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

One Valley Foundation

The ONE VALLEY FOUNDATION is committed to ensuring an inclusive community for our fans, united through a shared passion for sports.

$541k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.0MHealth$118kHuman Services$86kHousing & Shelter$71kCivil Rights$55kFood & Nutrition$51kPhilanthropy$40kRecreation & Sports$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $485,843, the rows itemized in this filing. The $541,418 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $55,575 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALM SPRINGS PLAZA THEATRE FOUNDATION$333,333
COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITION$71,303
FIRST BANK$25,000
GREATER PALM SPRINGS PRIDE$20,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
INLAND EMPIRE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
AMERICAN HOCKEY LEAGUE$9,207
MODERN MEN COACHELLA VALLEY CHORUS$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE PENDLETON FOUNDATION INC: $23k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 5 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $123k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsPublic BenefitAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GREATER PALM SPRINGS PRIDE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $76k · revenue +95%
  • UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $43k · revenue +3%
  • GF
    GRANT FUHR FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • BG
    BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $49k · revenue +34%
  • DC
    DESERT CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $46k · revenue +34%
  • TP
    THE PENDLETON FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $23k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coachella Valley Wellness Foundation

The foundation supports and promotes wellness in the coachella valley.

—
2
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
3
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…

Community Improvement
4
Pasadena Community Foundation

Pasadena Community Foundation builds and preserves permanently endowed charitable funds, provides grants and assistance to nurture and strengthen community organizations, serves donors to meet their philanthropic goals and promotes and…

Philanthropy
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
7
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
8
Valley Presbyterian Hospital Foundation

To render aid and obtain and administer funds and other property to be used in furtherance of the purposes of valley presbyterian hospital.

—
9
Adventist Health Foundation

The Foundation's mission is to endeavor to support programs and projects that measurably improve the physical and emotional health and health, wholeness and hope is coupled with a vision to transform the well-being in Paradise, and the…

Health
10
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
11
Kern County Cancer Foundation

Dedicated to assisting kern county residents who need financial assistance in obtaining treatment for cancer and associated diseases.

Health
12
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Southern California; the most unlike its peers is Modern Men Coachella Valley Men's Chorus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Palm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation: $999,999 · Arts & CulturePalm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation+1 more: $7,000 · Arts & CultureRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $43,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONAL…FIRST BANK: $25,000 · OtherFIRST BANKINDIO HIGH SCHOOL AG BOOSTERS: $20,000 · OtherINDIO HIGH SCH…Coachella Valley Unified School District: $20,000 · OtherCoachella Vall…Food Now Inc: $11,000 · OtherFood Now IncAmerican Hockey League: $9,207 · OtherTHE PENDLETON FOUNDATION INC: $23,310 · OtherTHE PENDLETON …COACHELLA VALLEY HOCKEY FOUNDATION CORP: $15,640 · OtherCOACHELLA VALL…LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $18,061 · Other+3 moreBIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC: $48,500 · PhilanthropyGRANT FUHR FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER PALM SPRINGS PRIDE INC: $76,285 · Civil RightsThe Coachella Valley Housing Coalition: $71,303 · Housing & ShelterDESERT CANCER FOUNDATION: $46,000 · HealthUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $43,000 · Public Benefit
Arts & Culture$1,006,999Other$195,218Philanthropy$88,500Civil Rights$76,285Housing & Shelter$71,303Health$46,000Public Benefit$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPalm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation: $999,999 over 3y, 22% of budgetGREATER PALM SPRINGS PRIDE INC: $76,285 over 3y, 13% of budgetThe Coachella Valley Housing Coalition: $71,303 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC: $48,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetDESERT CANCER FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $43,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT FUHR FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetTHE PENDLETON FOUNDATION INC: $23,310 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY HOCKEY FOUNDATION CORP: $15,640 over 1y, 80% of budgetFood Now Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Hockey League: $9,207 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMODERN MEN COACHELLA VALLEY MEN'S CHORUS: $7,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican Association of University Women Special Projects Fund: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAnimal Samaritans: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bighorn Golf Club Cha…Eisenhower Medical Ce…HN and Frances C Berg…The Grace Helen Spear…Inland Empire Communi…Raymond James Charita…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Bighorn Golf Club Charities IncCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Eisenhower Medical Center · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization One Valley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from One Valley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to One Valley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to One Valley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on One Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home