Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

One Skye Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$251k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Education$409kPhilanthropy$282kArts & Culture$173kRecreation & Sports$155kReligion$97kEnvironment$37kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $153k
  • $250k+1 grant · $251k
$5,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$975k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$251,000
AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$38,375
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$35,000
TEXAS BOOK FESTIVAL$30,000
BREAKTHROUGH AUSTIN$25,000
INTERFAITH ACTION OF CENTRAL TEXAS$15,000
ZILKER 351$10,000
UNITED WAY$5,100
AUSTIN SUNSHINE CAMPS$3,000
GREAT PROMISE FOR AMERICAN INDIANS$3,000
EVERGREEN AUSTIN$2,000
ANCIENT ART ARCHIVE$1,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$800
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$530
THE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE$413
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $3k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $5k → 10%THE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE: $413 → 10%WOMEN'S STORYBOOK PROJECT OF TEXAS: $100 → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OR
WY
CA
CO
VA
MD
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$825k · 17 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
35

Total granted

$825k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+36%

Still filing today

76%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    Texas Book Festival
    8× · 2018–2025 · $159k · revenue +84%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue +7%
  • TU
    THE UNITED WAY INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • SB
    SAVE BARTON CREEK ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -9%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
2
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
3
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
4
Austin Together Fund

Austin together enables sustained collaborations that strengthen the nonprofit community to create better outcomes for central texans through our unique grant and community engagement model.

Community Improvement
5
Shoal Creek Conservancy

The conservancy is dedicated to restoring, protecting and enhancing the ecological, social and cultural vibrancy of shoal creek in austin, texas, for the people of austin by engaging the public and partnering with the community, including…

Environment
6
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
7
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
8
Safe Streets Austin

Safe Streets Austin is a movement to transform Austins streets, bikeways, and trails into safe, vibrant, equitable places for people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike, roll, and gather.

Education
9
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
11
Texas Water Foundation

Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…

Environment
12
Farm and City

Farm&City is an independent 501c3 think & do tank dedicated to high quality urban & rural human habitat in Texas in perpetuity. We improve public policies to improve millions of Texans lives in ways that preserve and enhance Texas land,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Business ChambersAnimal Rescue and Shelter S…Policy Research & AdvocacyInternational Child WelfareHealthcare Providers and Me…Evangelical Gospel Churches
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%8%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr12%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%5%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%44%35–55yr12%12%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
15%
8,985/58,725

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
25/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $299,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTININTERFAITH ACTION OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $96,939 · OtherINTERFAITH ACTION OF CENTRAL TEXASTHE UNITED WAY INC — $37,800 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY INC+33 more — $101,050 · Other+33 moreTexas Book Festival — $158,785 · Recreation & SportsTexas Book FestivalBarton Springs Conservancy — $105,350 · Recreation & SportsBarton Springs Conservancy+2 more — $13,800 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $237,975 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUND…+1 more — $5,200 · PhilanthropyThe George Washington University — $45,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH — $25,000 · Education+4 more — $1,429 · EducationZilker 351 — $35,000 · Community ImprovementSAVE BARTON CREEK ASSOCIATION — $14,360 · EnvironmentTHE GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT INC (AUDIT) — $7,500 · EnvironmentEVERGREEN AUSTIN — $2,000 · Environment+1 more — $258 · EnvironmentNATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $5,500 · Arts & CultureCreative Action — $5,000 · Arts & CultureCONSPIRARE INC — $3,025 · Arts & CultureBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED — $2,500 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN CREATIVE ALLIANCE — $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$534,789Recreation & Sports$277,935Philanthropy$243,175Education$71,429Community Improvement$35,000Environment$24,118Arts & Culture$18,525

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $237,975 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Book Festival — $158,785 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetBarton Springs Conservancy — $105,350 over 6y, 18% of budgetThe George Washington University — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC — $37,800 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetZilker 351 — $35,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetSAVE BARTON CREEK ASSOCIATION — $14,360 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP — $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT INC (AUDIT) — $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $5,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE — $5,413 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE — $5,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCreative Action — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION — $4,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP AUSTIN — $3,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONSPIRARE INC — $3,025 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTERREWODE WOMENS FUND — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS PIG RESCUE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Children in Nature — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAUSTIN CREATIVE ALLIANCE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Seattle Food Bank — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEY CREEK FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $980 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS — $607 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC — $472 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trail Conservancy — $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBookSpring — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDLING FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS STORYBOOK PROJECT OF TEXAS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…Better Business BureauShield-Ayres Foundati…St David's FoundationTopfer Family Foundat…United Way for Greate…Alice Kleberg Reynold…The Webber Family Fou…The Powell FoundationBuena Vista FoundationEcg FoundationImpact Austin Foundat…
Austin Community Foundation IncTX45.3× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Better Business Bureau · Shield-Ayres Foundation · St David's Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · The Webber Family Foundation · The Powell Foundation · Buena Vista Foundation · Ecg Foundation · Impact Austin Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization One Skye Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home